Fields v. Ducart
Filing
33
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DEEMING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUBMITTED(terminating docket no. 32 ). (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/26/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
RONNIE FIELDS,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 16-cv-06494-HSG (PR)
ORDER DEEMING MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT SUBMITTED
v.
CLARK E. DUCART, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 32
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff Ronnie Fields, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), filed this pro se
14
civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 23, 2017, the Court found the complaint
15
stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim for deliberate indifference to safety and ordered the
16
action served on two defendants at PBSP. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on
17
June 14, 2017. Following one extension of time, plaintiff’s opposition was due by August 21,
18
2017. On September 6, 2017, the Court noted that plaintiff had not filed his opposition and gave
19
him an additional ten days in which to do so. As plaintiff still has not filed an opposition, the
20
motion for summary judgment is hereby deemed submitted, and no further briefing or exhibits
21
may be filed without leave of Court. A decision on the motion will be issued in a separate order.
22
Defendants’ motion for an extension of time to file a reply is DENIED as moot.
23
This order terminates Docket No. 32.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated: 9/26/2017
26
27
28
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?