Fleming v. Impax Laboratories Inc. et al
Filing
104
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 103 Stipulation Continuing Deadlines for Replies in Support of Motion to Intervene and Motion to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/26/2021)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705)
Morgan E. Whitworth (Bar No. 304907)
peter.wald@lw.com
morgan.whitworth@lw.com
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111-6538
Telephone: 415.391.0600
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
Christopher S. Turner (admitted pro hac vice)
Riley T. Keenan (admitted pro hac vice)
christopher.turner@lw.com
riley.keenan@lw.com
555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20004-1304
Telephone: 202.637.2200
Facsimile: 202.637.2201
12
Attorneys for Defendants
Impax Laboratories, LLC, Carole Ben-Maimon,
Larry Hsu, Bryan M. Reasons, and George
Frederick Wilkinson
13
Additional Counsel on Signature Page
11
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
OAKLAND DIVISION
17
18
GREG FLEMING, Individually and on
Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated,
19
20
21
22
v.
Plaintiff,
IMPAX LABORATORIES, INC., et al.,
Defendants,
CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06557-HSG
CLASS ACTION
STIPULATION AND ORDER
CONTINUING DEADLINES FOR
REPLIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO
INTERVENE AND MOTION TO DISMISS
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
STIP. AND ORDER
CONTINUING REPLY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06557-HSG
1
WHEREAS, this is a putative securities class action filed by Lead Plaintiff New York
2
Hotel Trades Council & Hotel Association of New York City, Inc. Pension Fund against
3
Defendants Impax Laboratories LLC (formerly known as Impax Laboratories, Inc.)1, George
4
Frederick Wilkinson, Larry Hsu, Bryan M. Reasons, and Carole Ben-Maimon (collectively,
5
“Defendants” and, together with Lead Plaintiff, the “Parties”);
6
WHEREAS, on April 1, 2021, this action was remanded from the Ninth Circuit;
7
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2021, Lead Plaintiff and putative intervenor Sheet Metal
8
Workers’ Pension Plan of Southern California, Arizona & Nevada (“Sheet Metal Workers’ Fund”)
9
jointly moved to allow Sheet Metal Workers’ Fund to intervene as an additional named plaintiff
10
to represent the class (Dkt. No. 93);
11
12
WHEREAS, on April 19, 2021, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Second Amended
Complaint (Dkt. No. 96);
13
WHEREAS, on April 20, 2021, the Court held a case management conference;
14
WHEREAS, On April 22, 2021, the Court entered an Order Setting Briefing Schedule and
15
Hearing for the Motion to Intervene and Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 98). Pursuant to the Parties’
16
Proposed Schedule, (Dkt. No. 95), the Court set May 31, 2021 as the deadline for Lead Plaintiff
17
and Sheet Metal Workers’ Fund to file a reply in support of Sheet Metal Workers’ Fund’s motion
18
to intervene, and Defendants to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss;
19
20
WHEREAS, given that May 31, 2021 is a federal holiday, the parties respectfully submit
that good cause exists to move the deadline for these replies to Tuesday, June 1, 2021;
21
22
IT IS ACCORDINGLY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the
Parties, that:
23
1.
Lead Plaintiff and Sheet Metal Workers’ Fund shall file any reply in support of
24
Sheet Metal Workers’ Fund’s motion to intervene, and Defendants shall file any reply in support
25
of their motion to dismiss, on or before June 1, 2021.
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1
As described further in Impax’s Amended Certification of Interested Entities, ECF No. 70,
Impax is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC.
1
STIP. AND ORDER
CONTINUING REPLY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06557-HSG
1
Dated: May 25, 2021
2
Respectfully submitted,
LATHAM & WATKINS LLP
3
By: /s/ Peter A. Wald
Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705)
peter.wald@lw.com
Morgan E. Whitworth (Bar No. 304907)
morgan.whitworth@lw.com
505 Montgomery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415.391.0600
Facsimile: 415.395.8095
4
5
6
7
8
Christopher S. Turner (admitted pro hac vice)
christopher.turner@lw.com
Riley T. Keenan (admitted pro hac vice)
riley.keenan@lw.com
555 Eleventh Street, NW, Suite 1000
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: 202.637.2200
Facsimile: 202.637.2201
9
10
11
12
13
Counsel for Defendants Impax Laboratories,
LLC, Carole Ben-Maimon, Larry Hsu, Bryan M.
Reasons, and George Frederick Wilkinson.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
DATED: May 25, 2021
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP
By: /s/ Erika Oliver
Spencer A. Burkholz
Luke O. Brooks
Eric I. Niehaus
Angel P. Lau
Jeffrey J. Stein
Erika Oliver
Natalie F. Lakosil
655 West Broadway, Suite 1900
San Diego, CA 92101
Telephone: 619/231-1058
619/231-7423 (fax)
Shawn A. Williams
Post Montgomery Center
One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: 415/288-4545
415/288-4534 (fax)
Samuel H. Rudman
2
STIP. AND ORDER
CONTINUING REPLY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06557-HSG
1
3
58 South Service Road, Suite 200
Melville, NY 11747
Telephone: 631/367-7100
631/367-1173 (fax)
4
Lead Counsel for Plaintiff
2
5
6
7
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
I am the ECF User whose identification and password are being used to file the foregoing
8
Stipulation.
Pursuant to L.R 5-1(i)(3) regarding signatures, I, Peter A. Wald, attest that
9
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
10
11
DATED: May 25, 2021
/s/ Peter A. Wald
Peter A. Wald (Bar No. 85705)
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
3
STIP. AND ORDER
CONTINUING REPLY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06557-HSG
1
PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
4
DATED:
5/26/2021
___________________________
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
4
STIP. AND ORDER
CONTINUING REPLY DEADLINE
CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06557-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?