Fleming v. Impax Laboratories Inc. et al

Filing 126

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 125 Administrative Motion to Exceed Page Limits for Motion for: (1) Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; (2) Approval of Plan of Allocation; (3) Award of Attorneys Fees and Expenses; and (4) Awards to Plaintiffs. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/13/2022)

Download PDF
1 ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP 2 SHAWN A. WILLIAMS (213113) Post Montgomery Center 3 One Montgomery Street, Suite 1800 San Francisco, CA 94104 4 Telephone: 415/288-4545 415/288-4534 (fax) 5 shawnw@rgrdlaw.com – and – 6 SPENCER A. BURKHOLZ (147029) THEODORE J. PINTAR (131372) 7 LUKE O. BROOKS (212802) ERIC I. NIEHAUS (239023) 8 JEFFREY J. STEIN (265268) ERIKA OLIVER (306614) 9 NATALIE F. LAKOSIL (322836) 655 West Broadway, Suite 1900 10 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619/231-1058 11 619/231-7423 (fax) spenceb@rgrdlw.com 12 tedp@rgrdlaw.com lukeb@rgrdlaw.com 13 eniehaus@rgrdlaw.com jstein@rgrdlaw.com 14 eoliver@rgrdlaw.com nlakosil@rgrdlaw.com 15 Lead Counsel for Plaintiff 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 OAKLAND DIVISION 19 GREG FLEMING, Individually and on Behalf ) Case No. 4:16-cv-06557-HSG 20 of All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) CLASS ACTION 21 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 22 vs. ) UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION ) TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS FOR THEIR 23 IMPAX LABORATORIES INC., et al., ) MOTION FOR: (1) FINAL APPROVAL OF ) CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT; (2) 24 Defendants. ) APPROVAL OF PLAN OF ALLOCATION; ) (3) AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND 25 EXPENSES; AND (4) AWARDS TO PLAINTIFFS PURSUANT TO 15 U.S.C. 26 §78u-4(a)(4) 27 28 1 Having considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Administrative Motion to Exceed Page Limits for 2 their Motion for: (1) Final Approval of Class Action Settlement; (2) Approval of Plan of Allocation; 3 (3) Award of Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses; and (4) Awards to Plaintiffs Pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 4 §78u-4(a)(4) and their Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (the “Final 5 Approval Motion”), the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ administrative motion. Plaintiffs are permitted 6 to file their Final Approval Motion ten pages in excess of the Court’s page limits under Civil Local 7 Rule 7-2(b) (i.e., the Final Approval Motion is not to exceed 35 pages). 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 1/13/2022 DATED: _____________________ _________________________________________ THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMITS - 4:16-cv-06557-HSG -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?