Smith v. Valencia et al
Filing
10
ORDER OF SERVICE Habeas Answer or Dispositive Motion due by 7/7/2017.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/8/17. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LAJAZZ A. SMITH,
Case No. 16-cv-06577-KAW (PR)
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER SERVING COGNIZABLE
CLAIM
v.
9
10
L. VALENCIA,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
Plaintiff Lajazz Smith, a state prisoner incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison, has filed
14
a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging the violation of her constitutional
15
rights by Correctional Officer L. Valencia. Plaintiff has consented to the jurisdiction of the
16
undersigned United States Magistrate Judge over this action. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to
17
proceed in forma pauperis is granted in a separate order. The Court now reviews Plaintiff’s
18
complaint.
DISCUSSION
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I. Preliminary Review of Complaint
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks
redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims
that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek
monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. Id. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). Pro se
pleadings must be liberally construed. Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Dep't, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th
Cir. 1988).
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires only “a short and plain statement of the
1
claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” “Specific facts are not necessary; the
2
statement need only “‘give the defendant fair notice of what the . . . claim is and the grounds upon
3
which it rests.’” Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 93 (2007) (citations omitted).
4
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements:
5
(1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that
6
the alleged violation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law. West v.
7
Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
8
9
Liability may be imposed on an individual defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 if the
plaintiff can show that the defendant’s actions both actually and proximately caused the
deprivation of a federally protected right. Lemire v. Cal. Dept. Corrections & Rehabilitation, 756
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
F.3d 1062, 1074 (9th Cir. 2013); Leer v. Murphy, 844 F.2d 628, 634 (9th Cir. 1988).
12
II. Plaintiff’s Claims
13
Plaintiff’s complaint alleges the following: Plaintiff is a transgender individual. Officer
14
Valencia discriminates against Plaintiff on the basis of her gender. For instance, Officer Valencia
15
harasses Plaintiff on a daily basis by calling her “bitches/gay, fags and boys” and tells other
16
inmates how Plaintiff was raped. Valencia has put Plaintiff “on the wall” and dug her nails into
17
Plaintiff’s right arm.
18
Liberally construed, the allegations appear to give rise to a cognizable Fourteenth
19
Amendment equal protection claim and a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim.
CONCLUSION
20
21
Based on the foregoing, the Court issues the following Orders:
22
1. Liberally construed, the allegations appear to give rise to a cognizable Fourteenth
23
Amendment equal protection claim and a cognizable Eighth Amendment excessive force claim
24
against Officer Valencia.
25
2. The Clerk of the Court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of
26
Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of the complaint
27
(docket no. 1) and all attachments thereto, a copy of this Order, and a copy of the form “Consent
28
or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction” to Officer L. Valencia at Salinas Valley State
2
1
Prison. This form can also be found at www.cand.uscourts.gov/civilforms. The Clerk shall also
2
mail a copy of the complaint and a copy of this Order to the State Attorney General’s Office in
3
San Francisco, and a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.
4
3. Defendant is cautioned that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires him
to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs of service of the summons and complaint. Pursuant to
6
Rule 4, if Defendant, after being notified of this action and asked by the Court, on behalf of
7
Plaintiff, to waive service of the summons, fails to do so, he will be required to bear the cost of
8
such service unless good cause be shown for his failure to sign and return the waiver forms. If
9
service is waived, this action will proceed as if Defendant had been served on the date that the
10
waiver is filed, except that pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(A)(ii), Defendant will not be required to
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
5
serve and file an answer before sixty days from the date on which the request for waiver was sent.
12
(This allows a longer time to respond than would be required if formal service of summons is
13
necessary.)
14
Defendant is advised to read the statement set forth at the foot of the waiver form that more
15
completely describes the duties of the parties with regard to waiver of service of the summons. If
16
service is waived after the date provided in the Notice but before Defendant has been personally
17
served, the answer shall be due sixty days from the date on which the request for waiver was sent
18
or twenty days from the date the waiver form is filed, whichever is later.
19
20
21
4. Defendant shall file his Consent or Declination to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction on or
before the date his answer is due.
5. The following briefing schedule shall govern dispositive motions in this action:
a. No later than thirty days from the date his answer is due, Defendant shall file a
22
23
motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion. If Defendant files a motion for
24
summary judgment, it shall be supported by adequate factual documentation and shall conform in
25
all respects to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. If Defendant is of the opinion that this case
26
cannot be resolved by summary judgment, he shall so inform the Court prior to the date the
27
summary judgment motion is due. All papers filed with the Court shall be promptly served on
28
Plaintiff.
3
1
At the time of filing the motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion,
2
Defendant shall comply with the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Woods v. Carey, 684 F.3d 934 (9th
3
Cir. 2012), and provide Plaintiff with notice of what is required of him to oppose a summary
4
judgment motion. If the motion is based on non-exhaustion of administrative remedies,
5
Defendants must comply with the notice and procedural requirements in Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d
6
1162 (9th Cir. 2014). See Stratton v. Buck, 697 F.3d 1004, 1008 (9th Cir. 2012).
7
b. Plaintiff’s opposition to the motion for summary judgment or other dispositive
8
motion shall be filed with the Court and served on Defendant no later than twenty-eight days after
9
the date on which Defendant’s motion is filed. The Ninth Circuit has held that the following notice
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
should be given to pro se plaintiffs facing a summary judgment motion:
The defendants have made a motion for summary judgment by which they seek to have
your case dismissed. A motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure will, if granted, end your case.
Rule 56 tells you what you must do in order to oppose a motion for summary judgment.
Generally, summary judgment must be granted when there is no genuine issue of material
fact -- that is, if there is no real dispute about any fact that would affect the result of your
case, the party who asked for summary judgment is entitled to judgment as a matter of law,
which will end your case. When a party you are suing makes a motion for summary
judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot
simply rely on what your complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in
declarations, depositions, answers to interrogatories, or authenticated documents, as
provided in Rule 56(e), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant’s declarations and
documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial. If you do not
submit your own evidence in opposition, summary judgment, if appropriate, may be
entered against you. If summary judgment is granted [in favor of the defendants], your
case will be dismissed and there will be no trial.
Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 962-63 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc).
Before filing his opposition, Plaintiff is advised to read the notice that will be provided to
23
him by Defendant when the motion is filed, and Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
24
and Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (party opposing summary judgment must come
25
forward with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on every essential element of his
26
claim). Plaintiff is cautioned that because he bears the burden of proving his allegations in this
27
case, he must be prepared to produce evidence in support of those allegations when he files his
28
opposition to Defendant’s summary judgment motion. Such evidence may include sworn
4
1
declarations from himself and other witnesses to the incident, copies of documents authenticated
2
by sworn declaration or discovery. Plaintiff will not be able to avoid summary judgment simply
3
by repeating the allegations of his complaint.
4
The same evidentiary requirement applies if the defendants file a motion for summary
5
judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. To oppose this motion, Plaintiff must
6
present any evidence he may have which tends to show that he did exhaust administrative
7
remedies or was excused from doing so. Again, the evidence may be in the form of declarations,
8
that is statements of fact from himself or other witnesses signed under penalty of perjury, copies of
9
documents accompanied by a declaration showing where they came from and why they are
authentic, or discovery documents such as answers to interrogatories or depositions. In
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
considering a summary judgment motion for failure to exhaust administrative remedies, the Court
12
can decide disputed issues of fact with regard to this portion of the case. See generally Albino,
13
747 F.3d at 1172-73; Stratton, 697 F.3d at 1008.
14
15
16
17
18
c. Defendant shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen days after the date
Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
d. The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No
hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.
6. Discovery may be taken in this action in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil
19
Procedure. No further court order pursuant to Rule 30(a)(2) or Local Rule 16 is required before
20
the parties may conduct discovery.
21
7. All communications by Plaintiff with the Court must be served on Defendant, or
22
Defendant’s counsel once counsel has been designated, by mailing a true copy of the document to
23
Defendant or his counsel.
24
8. It is Plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the Court
25
informed of any change of address by filing a separate paper with the clerk headed “Notice of
26
Change of Address,” and must comply with the Court's orders in a timely fashion. Failure to do so
27
may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
28
Procedure 41(b).
5
1
9. Extensions of time are not favored, though reasonable extensions will be granted. Any
2
motion for an extension of time must be filed no later than three days prior to the deadline sought
3
to be extended.
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2017
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?