Sarina King v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Filing
21
ORDER discharging 13 Order to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 12/11/2017. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
SARINA KING,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
v.
Case No. 4:16-cv-06643-KAW
ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO
SHOW CAUSE
Re: Dkt. No. 13
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Defendant.
12
13
Plaintiff commenced this social security action on November 16, 2016. (Dkt. No. 1.) On
14
November 16, 2016, the court issued a scheduling order requiring Plaintiff to file a motion for
15
summary judgment or motion for remand within 28 days of being served with Defendant’s
16
answer. (Dkt. No. 4.) The answer and administrative record were filed on May 8, 2017. (Dkt. Nos.
17
11 & 12.) Thus, Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment or motion for remand was due by June
18
5, 2017. Plaintiff did not timely file a motion for summary judgment or motion for remand, nor
19
did she seek relief from the deadline.
20
On September 19, 2017, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause, by no
21
later than October 3, 2017, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the
22
deadline to file the motion for summary judgment or seek relief from the procedural order
23
deadline, and to file a motion for summary judgment or motion for remand. (Dkt. No. 13.)
24
Plaintiff was advised that the failure to file both documents may result in the case being dismissed
25
for failure to prosecute. Id.
26
On September 19, 2017, Plaintiff’s counsel responded, and both apologized and informed
27
the court that she had been dealing with deaths and extended illnesses in her family, but that was
28
not an excuse for not seeking a timely extension. (Dkt. No. 14.) She later asked for a brief
1
extension of time to file the motion for summary judgment, which was granted. (Dkt. Nos. 15 &
2
17.) On October 11, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. No. 18.) The
3
Court notes that Plaintiff’s reply brief, filed on November 20, 2017, was timely filed. (See Dkt.
4
No. 20.)
5
In light of the foregoing, the order to show cause is DISCHARGED.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
Dated: December 11, 2017
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?