Cree, Inc. v. Maxbrite LED Lighting Technology, LLC et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 17 Stipulation, filed by Maxbrite LED Lighting Technology, LLC, Cree, Inc., John Anh Le. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/19/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016)

Download PDF
ER 12/19/16 H 8 N 9 ers F D IS T IC T O R 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 R NIA zalez Rog FO Attorneys for Plaintiff CREE, INC. RT 7 n onne Go Judge Yv NO 6 LI 5 TED GRAN A 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 3 S 2 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698 E-mail: Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697 E-mail: Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: 245227 E-mail: 6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326 Woodland Hills, California 91367 Telephone: (818) 888-7540 Facsimile: (818) 888-7544 UNIT ED 1 OAKLAND COURTHOUSE 13 14 CREE, INC., Plaintiff, 15 v. 16 17 Case No.: 4:16-cv-06689-YGR MAXBRITE LED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY, LLC, et al., STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS MAXBRITE LED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND JOHN ANH LE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT [Civil L.R. 6-1(a)] 18 Defendants. 19 20 Current response date: Stipulated response date: 12/20/2016 1/19/2017 Honorable Judge Yvonne G. Rogers 21 22 23 24 Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), Plaintiff Cree, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), through its counsel, and 25 Defendants Maxbrite LED Lighting Technology, LLC and John Anh Le (“Defendants”), through 26 their counsel (collectively, the “Parties”), do hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall 27 have an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint up to and including January 28 19, 2017. -1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - Case No.: 4:16-cv-06689-YGR 1 Defendants were served with a Summons and Complaint on November 29, 2016 making 2 a responsive pleading due on or before December 20, 2016. By way of this stipulation, the 3 Parties agree to a 30 day extension of time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint making a 4 responsive pleading due from Defendants on or before January 19, 2017. This extension will not 5 alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order. 6 7 DATED: December 15, 2016 8 JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP By: _/s/_Marcus F. Chaney___________ Marcus F. Chaney, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff CREE, INC. 9 10 11 12 DATED: December 15, 2016 INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, LLP 13 14 15 16 By: _/s/_Bonnie Wolf___________ Bonnie Wolf Attorneys for Defendants MAXBRITE LED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY, LLC and JOHN ANH LE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - Case No.: 4:16-cv-06689-YGR

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?