Cree, Inc. v. Maxbrite LED Lighting Technology, LLC et al
Filing
18
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING 17 Stipulation, filed by Maxbrite LED Lighting Technology, LLC, Cree, Inc., John Anh Le. Signed by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on 12/19/16. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/19/2016)
ER
12/19/16
H
8
N
9
ers
F
D IS T IC T O
R
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
R NIA
zalez Rog
FO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CREE, INC.
RT
7
n
onne Go
Judge Yv
NO
6
LI
5
TED
GRAN
A
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
3
S
2
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
Christopher D. Johnson, SBN: 222698
E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com
Christopher Q. Pham, SBN: 206697
E-mail: cpham@johnsonpham.com
Marcus F. Chaney, SBN: 245227
E-mail: mchaney@johnsonpham.com
6355 Topanga Canyon Boulevard, Suite 326
Woodland Hills, California 91367
Telephone:
(818) 888-7540
Facsimile:
(818) 888-7544
UNIT
ED
1
OAKLAND COURTHOUSE
13
14
CREE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
17
Case No.: 4:16-cv-06689-YGR
MAXBRITE LED LIGHTING
TECHNOLOGY, LLC, et al.,
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS MAXBRITE LED
LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY, LLC AND
JOHN ANH LE TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT
[Civil L.R. 6-1(a)]
18
Defendants.
19
20
Current response date:
Stipulated response date:
12/20/2016
1/19/2017
Honorable Judge Yvonne G. Rogers
21
22
23
24
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1(a), Plaintiff Cree, Inc. (“Plaintiff”), through its counsel, and
25
Defendants Maxbrite LED Lighting Technology, LLC and John Anh Le (“Defendants”), through
26
their counsel (collectively, the “Parties”), do hereby stipulate and agree that Defendants shall
27
have an extension of time to file a response to Plaintiff’s Complaint up to and including January
28
19, 2017.
-1STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - Case No.: 4:16-cv-06689-YGR
1
Defendants were served with a Summons and Complaint on November 29, 2016 making
2
a responsive pleading due on or before December 20, 2016. By way of this stipulation, the
3
Parties agree to a 30 day extension of time for Defendants to respond to the Complaint making a
4
responsive pleading due from Defendants on or before January 19, 2017. This extension will not
5
alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by Court order.
6
7
DATED: December 15, 2016
8
JOHNSON & PHAM, LLP
By: _/s/_Marcus F. Chaney___________
Marcus F. Chaney, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CREE, INC.
9
10
11
12
DATED: December 15, 2016
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW GROUP, LLP
13
14
15
16
By: _/s/_Bonnie Wolf___________
Bonnie Wolf
Attorneys for Defendants
MAXBRITE LED LIGHTING TECHNOLOGY,
LLC and JOHN ANH LE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT - Case No.: 4:16-cv-06689-YGR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?