Envista, LLC et al v. Audintel, Inc. et al

Filing 49

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 48 Stipulation Re 44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and/or Improper Venue to Continue Hearing. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 John V. Picone, Esq. (State Bar No. 187226) jpicone@hopkinscarley.com Jennifer S. Coleman, Esq. (State Bar No. 213210) jcoleman@hopkinscarley.com C. Gideon Korrell (State Bar No. 284890) gkorrell@hopkinscarley.com 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 HOPKINS & CARLEY A Law Corporation The Letitia Building 70 South First Street San Jose, California 95113-2406 mailing address: P.O. Box 1469 San Jose, CA 95109-1469 Telephone: (408) 286-9800 Facsimile: (408) 998-4790 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ENVISTA, LLC and ENVISTA CONCEPTS, LLC 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 OAKLAND DIVISION 15 16 ENVISTA, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company; and ENVISTA CONCEPTS, LLC, an Indiana limited liability company, Plaintiffs, 17 18 19 20 v. AUDINTEL, INC., a California corporation; RAGHVENDRA SINHA, an individual; and DOES 1-20, Defendants. 21 22 CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06765-HSG STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler Date: Time: Location: August 17, 2017 3:00 p.m. Courtroom 2 Trial Date: None 23 24 WHEREAS, on May 11, 2017, Defendant Raghvendra Sinha filed a Motion to Dismiss 25 for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or improper venue that is currently set to be heard by this 26 Court on August 17, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 44); 27 28 WHEREAS, on May 25, 2017, Plaintiffs’ Envista, LLC and Envista Concepts, LLC filed their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 45); -1626\2757854.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG 1 2 WHEREAS, on June 1, 2017, Defendant Raghvendra Sinha filed their Reply to the Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 46); and 3 WHEREAS, the parties wish to have the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss continued to a 4 later date, as the parties are in the process of attempting to negotiate a settlement to resolve this 5 matter; 6 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(b)(1), 7 ask the Court to order that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to 8 September 28, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 10 11 Dated: August 15, 2017. HOPKINS & CARLEY, A Law Corporation 12 By: /s/ John V. Picone III John v. Picone III Jennifer Coleman C. Gideon Korrell Attorneys for Plaintiffs enVista, LLC and enVista Concepts, LLC 13 14 15 16 17 Dated: August 15, 2017. PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS 18 By: /s/ Chad S. Perhson Jonathan O. Hafen Jenifer L. Tomchak Chad S. Pehrson 19 20 21 FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP C. Brandon Wisoff Deepak Gupta 22 23 Attorneys for Defendants Audintel, Inc. and Raghvendra Sinha 24 25 26 27 28 -2626\2757854.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 1 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in the 3 filing of this document from all signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” 4 signature (/ s /) within this electronically filed document and I have on file records to support this 5 concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request. 6 7 Dated: August 15, 2017. 8 9 By: /s/ John V. Picone III John V. Picone III Attorneys for Plaintiffs ENVISTA, LLC, and ENVISTA CONCEPTS, LLC 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3626\2757854.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: AUGUST 15, 2017 3 BY: 4 HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4626\2757854.1 STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?