Envista, LLC et al v. Audintel, Inc. et al
Filing
49
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 48 Stipulation Re 44 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and/or Improper Venue to Continue Hearing. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2017)
1
2
3
John V. Picone, Esq. (State Bar No. 187226)
jpicone@hopkinscarley.com
Jennifer S. Coleman, Esq. (State Bar No. 213210)
jcoleman@hopkinscarley.com
C. Gideon Korrell (State Bar No. 284890)
gkorrell@hopkinscarley.com
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
The Letitia Building
70 South First Street
San Jose, California 95113-2406
mailing address:
P.O. Box 1469
San Jose, CA 95109-1469
Telephone:
(408) 286-9800
Facsimile:
(408) 998-4790
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ENVISTA, LLC and ENVISTA CONCEPTS, LLC
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
OAKLAND DIVISION
15
16
ENVISTA, LLC, an Indiana limited liability
company; and ENVISTA CONCEPTS, LLC,
an Indiana limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
17
18
19
20
v.
AUDINTEL, INC., a California corporation;
RAGHVENDRA SINHA, an individual; and
DOES 1-20,
Defendants.
21
22
CASE NO. 4:16-cv-06765-HSG
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S
MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR
IMPROPER VENUE
Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr.
Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
Date:
Time:
Location:
August 17, 2017
3:00 p.m.
Courtroom 2
Trial Date: None
23
24
WHEREAS, on May 11, 2017, Defendant Raghvendra Sinha filed a Motion to Dismiss
25
for lack of personal jurisdiction and/or improper venue that is currently set to be heard by this
26
Court on August 17, 2017 at 3:00 p.m. (Dkt. No. 44);
27
28
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2017, Plaintiffs’ Envista, LLC and Envista Concepts, LLC filed
their Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 45);
-1626\2757854.1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG
1
2
WHEREAS, on June 1, 2017, Defendant Raghvendra Sinha filed their Reply to the
Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 46); and
3
WHEREAS, the parties wish to have the hearing on the Motion to Dismiss continued to a
4
later date, as the parties are in the process of attempting to negotiate a settlement to resolve this
5
matter;
6
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate, and pursuant to Local Rule 7-7(b)(1),
7
ask the Court to order that the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss shall be continued to
8
September 28, 2017 at 2:00 p.m.
9
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
10
11
Dated: August 15, 2017.
HOPKINS & CARLEY, A Law Corporation
12
By: /s/ John V. Picone III
John v. Picone III
Jennifer Coleman
C. Gideon Korrell
Attorneys for Plaintiffs enVista, LLC and
enVista Concepts, LLC
13
14
15
16
17
Dated: August 15, 2017.
PARR BROWN GEE & LOVELESS
18
By: /s/ Chad S. Perhson
Jonathan O. Hafen
Jenifer L. Tomchak
Chad S. Pehrson
19
20
21
FARELLA BRAUN + MARTEL LLP
C. Brandon Wisoff
Deepak Gupta
22
23
Attorneys for Defendants Audintel, Inc. and
Raghvendra Sinha
24
25
26
27
28
-2626\2757854.1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG
ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE
1
2
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in the
3
filing of this document from all signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed”
4
signature (/ s /) within this electronically filed document and I have on file records to support this
5
concurrence for subsequent production to the Court if so ordered or for inspection upon request.
6
7
Dated: August 15, 2017.
8
9
By: /s/ John V. Picone III
John V. Picone III
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
ENVISTA, LLC, and
ENVISTA CONCEPTS, LLC
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3626\2757854.1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG
1
2
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: AUGUST 15, 2017
3
BY:
4
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4626\2757854.1
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING ON RAGHVENDRA SINHA’S MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION AND/OR IMPROPER VENUE
CASE NO. 4:16-CV-06765-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?