McCarthy v. Frauenheim

Filing 29

ORDER REGARDING PETITIONERS SECOND MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE. (This order terminates docket no. 27 ). Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 10/12/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/12/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JAMES T MCCARTHY, Petitioner, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 16-cv-06820-HSG (PR) v. SCOTT FRAUENHEIM, Warden, Respondent. ORDER REGARDING PETITIONER’S SECOND MOTION FOR STAY AND ABEYANCE Re: Dkt. No. 27 12 13 Petitioner’s first motion for a stay and abeyance of the instant action pursuant to Rhines v. 14 Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), was granted on September 25, 2018. Dkt. No. 26. On September 15 27, 2018, apparently not having yet received the Court’s order, petitioner filed a second motion for 16 stay and abeyance. Dkt. Nos. 27, 28. The second motion for a stay is DENIED as unnecessary. 17 Petitioner reports that he has now exhausted all claims in the California Supreme Court. 18 As indicated in the September 25, 2018 order, petitioner must now file a motion to reopen the 19 instant action, clearly identifying each claim that has been exhausted in state court. Upon such 20 filing, the case will be reopened, and the Court will schedule further proceedings. 21 22 23 24 The Clerk is directed to re-send petitioner a copy of the Court’s September 25, 2018 order (Dkt. No. 26) and terminate Dkt. No. 27. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 10/12/2018 25 26 27 28 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?