Johnson v. Gipson et al

Filing 6

ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: This action is transferred to the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The Clerk shall transfer the case forthwith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on 1/24/2017. (ig, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/24/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 CASEY TAY JOHNSON, Case No. 16-cv-06940-DMR (PR) Plaintiff, 9 ORDER OF TRANSFER v. 10 11 C. GIPSON, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 On December 2, 2016, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 14 § 1983 stemming from constitutional violations that occurred at California State Prison-Los 15 Angeles County (“CSP-LAC”) in Lancaster, California, where he is currently incarcerated. Dkt. 16 1. Plaintiff also filed an in forma pauperis (“IFP”) application. Dkt. 2. 17 On the same day the action was filed, the Clerk of the Court notified Plaintiff that his IFP 18 application was deficient because of his failure to use the proper form and include a certificate of 19 funds as well as his prisoner trust account statement. The Clerk’s notice informed Plaintiff that he 20 must submit his IFP application on the proper form and provide the aforementioned supporting 21 documents within twenty-eight days or his action would be dismissed. More than twenty-eight 22 days have passed since December 2, 2016, the date the Clerk’s notice was sent to Plaintiff. To 23 date, he has not submitted a completed IFP application on the proper form or any of the requisite 24 supporting documents. 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff has consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction, and this matter has been assigned to the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Dkt. 3. The acts complained of occurred at CSP-LAC, which is located in the Western Division of the Central District of California, and it appears that Defendants reside in that district. Venue, 1 2 therefore, properly lies in that district and not in this one. See 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). Accordingly, in the interest of justice and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a), this action is 3 TRANSFERRED to the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Central 4 District of California. The Clerk shall transfer the case forthwith. 5 If Plaintiff wishes to further pursue this action, he must complete the IFP application 6 required by the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Central District of 7 California and mail the IFP application and any supporting documents to that district. 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 All pending motions are TERMINATED on this court’s docket as no longer pending in this district. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 24, 2017 ______________________________________ DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CASEY TAY JOHNSON, Case No. 4:16-cv-06940-DMR Plaintiff, 5 v. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 6 7 C. GIPSON, et al., Defendants. 8 9 10 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 That on January 24, 2017, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 Casey Tay Johnson T-50658 PO Box 4670 Lancaster, CA 93539 19 20 Dated: January 24, 2017 21 22 Susan Y. Soong Clerk, United States District Court 23 24 25 26 27 By:________________________ Ivy Lerma Garcia, Deputy Clerk to the Honorable DONNA M. RYU 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?