Alviso et al v. City of San Rafael
Filing
24
Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton denying as moot 15 Motion to Dismiss.(pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/1/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ANTHONY ALVISO, et al.,
9
v.
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS AS MOOT
10
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 16-cv-07056-PJH
Plaintiffs,
8
Defendant.
Re: Dkt. No. 15
12
13
14
Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint. Dkt. 15.
15
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), plaintiffs filed an amended
16
complaint on February 28, 2017. Dkt. 23. As a result, defendant’s motion to dismiss the
17
original complaint is DENIED as MOOT, without prejudice to defendant filing a motion to
18
dismiss the amended complaint. The hearing noticed for March 22 is also hereby
19
VACATED.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 1, 2017
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?