Austin et al v. Foodliner, Inc.

Filing 46

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Stipulation Regarding Plaintiffs Deadline to File a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. Motions due by 6/22/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 HUNTER PYLE (SBN 191125) CHAD SAUNDERS (SBN 257810) HUNTER PYLE LAW 428 Thirteenth Street, Eleventh Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 444-4400 Facsimile: (510) 444-4410 Emails: hunter@hunterpylelaw.com; csaunders@hunterpylelaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs RONDA AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER CORDUCK, ERNEST DIAL, BILLY WAYNE GIBSON and BOBBY G. SMITH MOLLIE M. BURKS (SBN 222112) SAT SANG S. KHALSA (SBN 256130) NICHOLAS A. DEMING (SBN 287917) GORDON & REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP 275 Battery Street, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 986-5900 Facsimile: (415) 986-8054 Emails: mburks@grsm.com; skhalsa@grsm.com; ndeming@grsm.com Attorneys for Defendant FOODLINER, INC. 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 OAKLAND DIVISION 18 19 20 21 RONDA AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER CORDUCK, ERNEST DIAL, BILLY WAYNE GIBSON, and BOBBY G. SMITH, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated; Plaintiffs, 22 23 24 25 Case No. 4:16-cv-07185-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. FOODLINER, INC., Defendant. 26 27 28 Case No. 4:16-cv-07185-HSG STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION 0 1 Plaintiffs RONDA AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER CORDUCK, ERNEST DIAL, BILLY 2 WAYNE GIBSON, and BOBBY G. SMITH (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant FOODLINER, INC. 3 (“Defendant” or “FOODLINER”) (together with Plaintiffs, “the Parties”) hereby submit the 4 following stipulation and proposed order continuing the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion 5 for preliminary approval of the Parties’ class action settlement. 6 7 WHEREAS, the Parties reached an agreement to settle the class action claims in this case on April 10, 2018; 8 9 10 WHEREAS, the Parties notified the Court of this settlement on April 19, 2018 (Dkt. 43); WHEREAS, the Court vacated Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a motion for class 11 certification and set a deadline of June 4, 2018, for Plaintiffs to file a motion for preliminary 12 approval (Dkt. 44); and 13 14 15 WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing to finalize the settlement agreement and anticipate completing the agreement by June 11, 2018. Based on the foregoing, the Parties, by and through their counsel of record and subject 16 to this Court’s approval, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiffs’ to file a 17 motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement should be continued until June 18 22, 2018. 19 20 21 IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: June 1, 2018 HUNTER PYLE LAW 22 23 24 25 26 By:_/s/ Chad Saunders________________ Hunter Pyle Chad Saunders Attorneys for Plaintiffs RONDA AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER CORDUCK, ERNEST DIAL, BILLY WAYNE GIBSON and BOBBY G. SMITH 27 28 Case No. 4:16-cv-07185-HSG STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION 1 1 ATED: June 1, 2018 e DA GORDON & REES SC CULLY MANSUKH HANI LLP 2 3 By:_/s/ Sat Sang S. Kha alsa_______ ______ Mollie M Burks M. Sat San S. Khalsa ng Nichola A. Demin as ng 4 5 Attorneys for Defenda ant FOODLIN NER, INC. 6 7 8 9 Attestation Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) A P e y a es med re I hereby attest that all signatorie indicated by a conform signatur (/s/) have concurred 10 t t in the filing of this document. 11 Dat ted: June 1, 2018 12 /s/ Chad S Saunders Chad Saun nders 13 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULA T ATION, IT IS SO ORDE I ERED. 15 Dat ted: June 4, 2018 16 17 18 __________ ___________ _____ _________ Hon. Hayw wood S. Gill liam, Jr. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case N 4:16-cv-07 No. 7185-HSG STIP PULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE PR R E RELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?