Austin et al v. Foodliner, Inc.
Filing
46
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 45 Stipulation Regarding Plaintiffs Deadline to File a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement. Motions due by 6/22/2018. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2018)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
HUNTER PYLE (SBN 191125)
CHAD SAUNDERS (SBN 257810)
HUNTER PYLE LAW
428 Thirteenth Street, Eleventh Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 444-4400
Facsimile: (510) 444-4410
Emails: hunter@hunterpylelaw.com; csaunders@hunterpylelaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs RONDA AUSTIN,
CHRISTOPHER CORDUCK, ERNEST DIAL,
BILLY WAYNE GIBSON and BOBBY G. SMITH
MOLLIE M. BURKS (SBN 222112)
SAT SANG S. KHALSA (SBN 256130)
NICHOLAS A. DEMING (SBN 287917)
GORDON & REES SCULLY MANSUKHANI LLP
275 Battery Street, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 986-5900
Facsimile: (415) 986-8054
Emails: mburks@grsm.com; skhalsa@grsm.com; ndeming@grsm.com
Attorneys for Defendant
FOODLINER, INC.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
OAKLAND DIVISION
18
19
20
21
RONDA AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER
CORDUCK, ERNEST DIAL, BILLY
WAYNE GIBSON, and BOBBY G. SMITH,
on behalf of themselves and others similarly
situated;
Plaintiffs,
22
23
24
25
Case No. 4:16-cv-07185-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER
REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’
DEADLINE TO FILE A MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS
ACTION SETTLEMENT
vs.
FOODLINER, INC.,
Defendant.
26
27
28
Case No. 4:16-cv-07185-HSG
STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION
0
1
Plaintiffs RONDA AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER CORDUCK, ERNEST DIAL, BILLY
2
WAYNE GIBSON, and BOBBY G. SMITH (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant FOODLINER, INC.
3
(“Defendant” or “FOODLINER”) (together with Plaintiffs, “the Parties”) hereby submit the
4
following stipulation and proposed order continuing the deadline for Plaintiffs to file a motion
5
for preliminary approval of the Parties’ class action settlement.
6
7
WHEREAS, the Parties reached an agreement to settle the class action claims in this
case on April 10, 2018;
8
9
10
WHEREAS, the Parties notified the Court of this settlement on April 19, 2018 (Dkt.
43);
WHEREAS, the Court vacated Plaintiffs’ deadline to file a motion for class
11
certification and set a deadline of June 4, 2018, for Plaintiffs to file a motion for preliminary
12
approval (Dkt. 44); and
13
14
15
WHEREAS, the Parties are continuing to finalize the settlement agreement and
anticipate completing the agreement by June 11, 2018.
Based on the foregoing, the Parties, by and through their counsel of record and subject
16
to this Court’s approval, hereby stipulate and agree that the deadline for Plaintiffs’ to file a
17
motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement should be continued until June
18
22, 2018.
19
20
21
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: June 1, 2018
HUNTER PYLE LAW
22
23
24
25
26
By:_/s/ Chad Saunders________________
Hunter Pyle
Chad Saunders
Attorneys for Plaintiffs RONDA AUSTIN,
CHRISTOPHER CORDUCK, ERNEST
DIAL, BILLY WAYNE GIBSON and
BOBBY G. SMITH
27
28
Case No. 4:16-cv-07185-HSG
STIPULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION
1
1
ATED: June 1, 2018
e
DA
GORDON & REES SC
CULLY
MANSUKH
HANI LLP
2
3
By:_/s/ Sat Sang S. Kha
alsa_______
______
Mollie M Burks
M.
Sat San S. Khalsa
ng
Nichola A. Demin
as
ng
4
5
Attorneys for Defenda
ant
FOODLIN
NER, INC.
6
7
8
9
Attestation Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3)
A
P
e
y
a
es
med
re
I hereby attest that all signatorie indicated by a conform signatur (/s/) have concurred
10
t
t
in the filing of this document.
11
Dat
ted: June 1, 2018
12
/s/ Chad S
Saunders
Chad Saun
nders
13
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULA
T
ATION, IT IS SO ORDE
I
ERED.
15
Dat
ted: June 4, 2018
16
17
18
__________
___________
_____
_________
Hon. Hayw
wood S. Gill
liam, Jr.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case N 4:16-cv-07
No.
7185-HSG
STIP
PULATION RE DEADLINE TO FILE PR
R
E
RELIMINARY APPROVAL MOTION
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?