Thetford v. Davis
Filing
12
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; DENYING REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL RE 10 . Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/18/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2017)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
DEXTON THETFORD,
Petitioner,
5
6
7
8
Case No. 17-cv-00092-HSG (PR)
v.
RON DAVIS, Warden,
Respondent.
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY;
DENYING REQUEST FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
Re: Dkt. No. 10
9
10
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging the California Board of Prison Terms’ denial of parole.
12
On March 31, 2017, the Court dismissed the petition pursuant to Swarthout v. Cooke, 131 S. Ct.
13
859, 862 (2011) and entered judgment in favor of Respondent. On April 10, 2017, Petitioner filed
14
a notice of appeal. Petitioner also filed a request for a certificate of appealability and a request for
15
appointment of counsel.
16
Petitioner’s request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED for the reasons stated at
17
pages 2-3 of the Order of Dismissal. (Docket No. 7.) The Clerk shall forward this order to the
18
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, from which Petitioner may also seek a
19
certificate of appealability. See United States v. Asrar, 116 F.3d 1268, 1270 n.2 (9th Cir. 1997).
20
Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel on appeal is DENIED without prejudice to
21
filing it directly in the Ninth Circuit.
22
This order terminates Docket No. 10.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
Dated: 4/18/2017
25
26
27
28
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?