Bestway (USA), Inc. et al v. SGROMO et al
Filing
148
JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/18/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2019)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BESTWAY (USA), INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,
8
11
JUDGMENT
v.
9
10
Case No. 17-cv-00205-HSG
PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONI SGROMO,
et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
Having ordered the funds distributed and discharged the interpleader, see Dkt. No. 107,
14
and awarded attorneys’ fees and costs to Plaintiffs, see Dkt. No. 144, the Court enters judgment as
15
follows:
16
1. Plaintiffs Bestway (USA) Inc., Bestway (Hong Kong) International Ltd., and Bestway
17
Inflatables and Material Corporation’s (collectively, “the Bestway Companies” or
18
“Plaintiffs”) having brought this interpleader action to determine who owns certain
19
royalties, which are currently in escrow and flow from two license agreements
20
(“Royalty Payment”), are deemed innocent stakeholders of such Royalty Payment; and
21
the Bestway Companies are discharged from this matter upon depositing with the
22
registry of the Court the Royalty Payment, reduced by the fees and costs awarded to
23
the Bestway Companies under their granted fees motion, as described below.
24
2. Within 30 days of the entry of this Judgment, the Bestway Companies shall deposit
25
with the registry of the Court the present value of the Royalty Payment, accrued under
26
the ’440 Patent License Agreement and the Slide License Agreement, reduced by the
27
$81,911.70 in fees and costs awarded to the Bestway Companies under their granted
28
fees motion, see Dkt. No. 144.
1
3. The Royalty Payment deposited with the registry of the Court shall be disbursed in
2
accordance with this Court’s findings on summary judgment that Defendant Scott was
3
at the time of the ‘440 Patent License Agreement, Dkt. No. 79-6, the owner of all right,
4
title, and interest to U.S. Patent No. 7,046,440; that Defendant Eureka was the owner
5
of all rights with respect to the products that are the subject of the Water Slide License
6
Agreement, Dkt. No. 79-7, at the time that the Water Slide Agreement was entered; and
7
that Defendants Scott and Eureka are entitled to all royalties accrued under the ‘440
8
Patent License Agreement and the Water Slide License Agreement, subject to the
9
above-referenced reduction for fees and costs awarded to the Bestway Companies
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
under their granted fees motion.
4. The Bestway Companies and their past, present, and future parents, subsidiaries,
12
affiliates, successor, predecessors, assignees, agents, producers, servants, employees,
13
officers, directors, principals, representatives, attorneys, and insurers are hereby
14
released and discharged from all liability by Defendants Pietro Pasquale-Antonio
15
Sgromo (a/k/a Peter Anthony Sgromo), Wagmore & Barkless LLC, Leonard Gregory
16
Scott, and Eureka Inventions LLC or any other entity claiming an interest, on account
17
of all claims pertaining to the Royalty Payment.
18
5. To the fullest extent provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2361, Defendants are permanently
19
and perpetually restrained and enjoined from filing or prosecuting any claim in any
20
federal or state court pertaining to the Royalty Payment.
21
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 4/18/2019
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?