Bestway (USA), Inc. et al v. SGROMO et al

Filing 148

JUDGMENT. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/18/2019. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/18/2019)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BESTWAY (USA), INC., et al., Plaintiffs, 8 11 JUDGMENT v. 9 10 Case No. 17-cv-00205-HSG PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONI SGROMO, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. 12 13 Having ordered the funds distributed and discharged the interpleader, see Dkt. No. 107, 14 and awarded attorneys’ fees and costs to Plaintiffs, see Dkt. No. 144, the Court enters judgment as 15 follows: 16 1. Plaintiffs Bestway (USA) Inc., Bestway (Hong Kong) International Ltd., and Bestway 17 Inflatables and Material Corporation’s (collectively, “the Bestway Companies” or 18 “Plaintiffs”) having brought this interpleader action to determine who owns certain 19 royalties, which are currently in escrow and flow from two license agreements 20 (“Royalty Payment”), are deemed innocent stakeholders of such Royalty Payment; and 21 the Bestway Companies are discharged from this matter upon depositing with the 22 registry of the Court the Royalty Payment, reduced by the fees and costs awarded to 23 the Bestway Companies under their granted fees motion, as described below. 24 2. Within 30 days of the entry of this Judgment, the Bestway Companies shall deposit 25 with the registry of the Court the present value of the Royalty Payment, accrued under 26 the ’440 Patent License Agreement and the Slide License Agreement, reduced by the 27 $81,911.70 in fees and costs awarded to the Bestway Companies under their granted 28 fees motion, see Dkt. No. 144. 1 3. The Royalty Payment deposited with the registry of the Court shall be disbursed in 2 accordance with this Court’s findings on summary judgment that Defendant Scott was 3 at the time of the ‘440 Patent License Agreement, Dkt. No. 79-6, the owner of all right, 4 title, and interest to U.S. Patent No. 7,046,440; that Defendant Eureka was the owner 5 of all rights with respect to the products that are the subject of the Water Slide License 6 Agreement, Dkt. No. 79-7, at the time that the Water Slide Agreement was entered; and 7 that Defendants Scott and Eureka are entitled to all royalties accrued under the ‘440 8 Patent License Agreement and the Water Slide License Agreement, subject to the 9 above-referenced reduction for fees and costs awarded to the Bestway Companies 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 under their granted fees motion. 4. The Bestway Companies and their past, present, and future parents, subsidiaries, 12 affiliates, successor, predecessors, assignees, agents, producers, servants, employees, 13 officers, directors, principals, representatives, attorneys, and insurers are hereby 14 released and discharged from all liability by Defendants Pietro Pasquale-Antonio 15 Sgromo (a/k/a Peter Anthony Sgromo), Wagmore & Barkless LLC, Leonard Gregory 16 Scott, and Eureka Inventions LLC or any other entity claiming an interest, on account 17 of all claims pertaining to the Royalty Payment. 18 5. To the fullest extent provided by 28 U.S.C. § 2361, Defendants are permanently 19 and perpetually restrained and enjoined from filing or prosecuting any claim in any 20 federal or state court pertaining to the Royalty Payment. 21 22 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/18/2019 ______________________________________ HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?