Bestway (USA), Inc. et al v. SGROMO et al

Filing 95

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 94 Administrative Motion for an Extension of Time to File Proposed Order and Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/10/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 THOMAS E. MOORE III (SBN 115107) ROYSE LAW FIRM, PC 149 Commonwealth Drive, Suite 1001 Menlo Park, California 94025 Telephone: (650) 813-9700 Facsimile: (650) 813-9777 E-mail: tmoore@rroyselaw.com 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka Inventions LLC 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 14 BESTWAY (USA), INC.; BESTWAY (HONG KONG) INTERNATIONAL LTD.; and BESTWAY INFLATABLES AND MATERIAL CORPORATION, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 vs. 17 18 19 20 PIETRO PASQUALE-ANTONIO SGROMO (a/k/a PETER ANTHONY SGROMO); WAGMORE & BARKLESS LLC; LEONARD GREGORY SCOTT; and EUREKA INVENTIONS LLC, 21 Defendants. 22 23 AND RELATED CROSSCLAIM 24 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 25 26 /// 27 28 ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOT. FOR EXTENSION CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG 1 Defendants and crossclaimants Leonard Gregory Scott and Eureka Inventions, LLC 2 (“Crossclaimants”), filed an administrative motion requesting an extension to submit their proposed 3 order and judgment as required under the Court’s order (ECF No. 90). Good cause appearing, 4 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the administrative motion is granted, that the 5 Crossclaimants shall have until July 18, 2018 within which to submit their proposed order and 6 judgment. 7 8 Dated: July 10, 2018 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER GRANTING ADMIN. MOT. FOR EXTENSION CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00205-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?