Avila v. Bank of America et al
Filing
53
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 52 Motion to Appear by Telephone at Hearings on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
Matthew Mellen (Bar No. 233350)
MELLEN LAW FIRM
One Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
(415) 315-1653
Facsimile:
(415) 276-1902
Attorney for Plaintiff,
MIGUEL AVILA
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MIGUEL AVILA, an individual
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
Case No: 3:17-cv-00222-HSG
Plaintiffs,
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT
HEARINGS ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTIONS TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, a national association;
U.S. BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, a
business entity; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,
LLC, a business entity; CALIBER HOME
LOANS, INC., a business entity; and Does 1
through 100, inclusive,
Complaint Filed: December 19, 2016
Date Removed: January 17, 2017
Defendants.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER
The Co
ourt, having read and considered Pla
aintiff’s coun
nsel’s reques for telepho
st
onic
1
ap
ppearance at the hearing on Defendan Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s F
nts’
s
First Amend
ded
2
Co
omplaint:
3
4
Plaintiffs’ Request for a Teleph
t
honic Appea
arance is GR
RANTED.
1. Plaintiffs’ counsel may appear by telephon at the hea
r
ne
aring on Plain
ntiff’s Defen
ndants’
Motion to Dismis Plaintiff’s First Amend Compla
ns
ss
ded
aint, and
5
6
7
8
9
2.
Couns shall cont CourtCa at (866) 5
sel
tact
all
582-6878 to make arrang
gements for the
telepho appeara
onic
ance.
DA
ATED: Apr 20, 2017
ril
____
___________
__________
_______
Hon. Haywood S Gilliam, Jr
.
S.
r.
U.S. District Cou Judge
urt
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORD
DER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?