Aspic Engineering and Construction Company v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC et al
ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers denying 44 Motion for Reconsideration. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ASPIC ENGINEERING AND
Case No. 17-cv-00224-YGR
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECONSIDER
VACATING THE ARBITRATION AWARD
ECC CENTCOM CONSTRUCTORS, LLC
AND ECC INTERNATIONAL, LLC,
Northern District of California
United States District Court
Plaintiff Aspic Engineering and Construction Company has filed a Motion to Reconsider
Vacating the Arbitration Award entered against defendants ECC International, LLC and ECC
CENTCOM Constructors, LLC, and in favor of plaintiff. (Dkt. No. 44.) Under Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 54(b), “[r]econsideration is appropriate if the district court (1) is presented with newly
discovered evidence, (2) committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or (3) if
there is an intervening change in controlling law.” School Dist. No. 1J v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255,
1263 (9th Cir. 1993).
Pursuant to Local Rule 7-9(a), “[n]o party may notice a motion for reconsideration without
first obtaining leave of Court to file the motion.” This Court has not granted plaintiff leave to file a
motion for reconsideration nor has plaintiff satisfied the standard. The Court thus finds that plaintiff
has not complied with Local Rule 7-9(a) and DENIES plaintiff’s motion.
This terminates Dkt. No. 44.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 25, 2017
Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers
United States District Court Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?