Fast Trak Investment Company, LLC v. Richard P. Sax

Filing 41

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore granting 34 Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer. Defendant is required to E-FILE the amended document. ORDER terminating 39 Motion to Appear by Telephone as moot. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/27/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 FAST TRAK INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, 9 v. 10 11 RICHARD P SAX, et al., United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants. Case No. 4:17-cv-00257-KAW ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED ANSWER; ORDER TERMINATING REQUEST TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AS MOOT Re: Dkt. Nos. 34, 39 12 13 On June 23, 2017, Defendant Richard P. Sax filed a motion for leave to file an amended 14 answer to add the affirmative defense of champerty. (Def.’s Mot., Dkt. No. 34 at 1.) Plaintiff did 15 not file an opposition. “The failure of the opposing party to file a memorandum of points and 16 authorities in opposition to any motion shall constitute consent to the granting of the motion.” 17 Judge Westmore’s General Standing Order ¶ 22. 18 Accordingly, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument 19 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and GRANTS Defendant’s motion for leave to file an 20 amended answer. Defendant shall file the amended answer within 7 days of this order. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Additionally, the Court TERMINATES Defendant’s request to appear telephonically at the August 3, 2017 hearing (Dkt. No. 39) as MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 27, 2017 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?