Muro v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO PLAINTIFF WHY EQUIFAX, INC. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/19/17. Show Cause Response due by 4/28/2017. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 7 JE ESSE MURO O, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 Case No. 1 17-cv-00350 0-JSW v. EX XPERIAN INFORMAT I TION SOLU UTIONS, IN et al., NC., ORDER T PLAINT TO TIFF TO SH HOW CAUSE W WHY EQUIF FAX, INC. SHOULD NOT BE D DISMISSED FROM SE D ECOND AMENDE COMPLAINT ED Re: Dkt. N 24 No. United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants s. 12 13 On Mar 20, 2017 Plaintiff vo rch 7, oluntarily di ismissed Equ uifax, Inc. w prejudice from these with e 14 oceedings. (Dkt. No. 16.) On April 10, 2017, Pl laintiff filed a Second A Amended Com mplaint, in pro 15 wh Equifax, Inc. is nam as a Defe hich med endant. 16 Accord dingly, Plaint is HERE tiff EBY ORDER RED TO SH HOW CAUSE why Equif Inc. E fax, 17 sho ould not be dismissed, ba d ased on the prior notice of dismissal Plaintiff’s response to this Order p l. s o 18 to Show Cause shall be due by April 28, 2017. S e e 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: April 19 2017 9, ___ __________ ___________ __________ ________ JEF FFREY S. W WHITE Un nited States D District Judg ge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?