Muro v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 25

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE TO PLAINTIFF WHY EQUIFAX, INC. SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FROM SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/19/17. Show Cause Response due by 4/28/2017. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/19/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

JE
ESSE MURO
O,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10
11

Case No. 1
17-cv-00350
0-JSW

v.
EX
XPERIAN INFORMAT
I
TION SOLU
UTIONS,
IN et al.,
NC.,

ORDER T PLAINT
TO
TIFF TO SH
HOW
CAUSE W
WHY EQUIF
FAX, INC. SHOULD
NOT BE D
DISMISSED FROM SE
D
ECOND
AMENDE COMPLAINT
ED
Re: Dkt. N 24
No.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants
s.
12
13

On Mar 20, 2017 Plaintiff vo
rch
7,
oluntarily di
ismissed Equ
uifax, Inc. w prejudice from these
with
e

14

oceedings. (Dkt. No. 16.) On April 10, 2017, Pl
laintiff filed a Second A
Amended Com
mplaint, in
pro

15

wh Equifax, Inc. is nam as a Defe
hich
med
endant.

16

Accord
dingly, Plaint is HERE
tiff
EBY ORDER
RED TO SH
HOW CAUSE why Equif Inc.
E
fax,

17

sho
ould not be dismissed, ba
d
ased on the prior notice of dismissal Plaintiff’s response to this Order
p
l.
s
o

18

to Show Cause shall be due by April 28, 2017.
S
e
e

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: April 19 2017
9,
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JEF
FFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge