Herrera v. Equifax, Inc. et al

Filing 22

FINAL ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SERVICE ON CITIBANK. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 5/17/17. Show Cause Response due by 5/22/2017.(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2017) Modified on 5/17/2017 (jjoS, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

RENATO HERRERA,

8

Plaintiff,

9
10
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 17-cv-00351-JSW

12

FINAL ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE REGARDING SERVICE
ON CITIBANK

v.
EQUIFAX, INC., and CITIBANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 19

Defendants.

13
14

On May 1, 2017, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause to Plaintiff, directing him to

15

show cause why it should not dismiss this case as to Citibank National Association (“Citibank”)

16

based on the failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Plaintiff’s response to

17

the Order to Show Cause was due by no later than May 15, 2017. Plaintiff has not responded to

18

the Order to Show Cause.

19

In light of the large number of cases filed by Plaintiff’s counsel, the Court shall not

20

penalize Plaintiff, and it shall afford Plaintiff one final opportunity to respond to the Order to

21

Show Cause. Plaintiff’s response to this Final Order to Show Cause shall be due by May 22,

22

2017. If Plaintiff has not filed a response by that date, the Court shall dismiss Citibank without

23

prejudice, for failure to comply with Rule 4(m).

24

Finally, the Court issues this admonishment to Plaintiff’s counsel. The Sagaria Law Firm

25

chose to file hundreds of these cases within this District. It is not the Court’s responsibility to

26

keep track of deadlines and filing requirements.

27

Going forward, Plaintiff’s counsel is admonished that failure to comply with Court

28

imposed deadlines may result in orders to show cause as to why monetary sanctions should not be

1
2
3
4
5

imp
posed for fai
ilure to comp with tho deadlines
ply
ose
s.
IT IS SO ORDER
S
RED.
Da
ated: May 17 2017
7,
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JEF
FFREY S. W
WHITE
Un
nited States D
District Judg
ge

6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2