Reese v. TransUnion, LLC et al

Filing 28

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/1/17. Show Cause Response due by 5/15/2017. Joint Case Management Statement due by 6/9/2017. Initial Case Management Conference set for 6/16/2017 11:00 AM in Courtroom 5, 2nd Floor, Oakland.(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RYAN REESE, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 Case No. 17-cv-00388-JSW v. TRANSUNION, LLC., AVANT, INC., DESERT SPRINGS HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, EMERGENCY MEDICINE PHYSICIANS OF CLARK SAINT ROSE MCCOURT, PLLC, and PROVIDENCE MEDICAL CENTER, ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; AND ORDER TO PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 27 Defendants. 14 15 16 The Court has received the parties’ joint case management conference statement. On April 17 18, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice that he had reached a settlement with Desert Springs Hospital 18 Medical Center (“Desert Springs”) and stated that he anticipated a dismissal would be filed within 19 thirty (30) days. (Dkt. No. 26.) Plaintiff confirms that position in the joint case management 20 conference statement, but he has not yet dismissed Desert Springs. (Dkt. No. 27, Joint Case 21 Management Conference Statement at 10:26-27.) 22 The only other named defendants that remain in this case are Emergency Medicine 23 Physicians of Clark Saint Rose McCourt, PLLC and Providence Medical Center (the “Unserved 24 Defendants”). Plaintiff filed his Complaint on January 25, 2017, and he had until April 25, 2017 25 to serve the Unserved Defendants. Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service on the Unserved 26 Defendants. 27 28 Accordingly, Plaintiff is HEREBY ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why the Court should not dismiss the case as to the Unserved Defendants based on the failure to comply with Federal 1 Ru of Civil Procedure 4(m If Plaintiff has serve either, or both, of the Unserved D ule P m). ed r e Defendants 2 wit thin the time period set forth in Rule 4(m), when he respond to this Ord to Show Cause, he e f e n ds der 3 sho ould file a pr roof of service. If Plaint has not y served th Unserved Defendants and seeks tiff yet he 4 lea of court to extend the time in which he has to serve them he must sh good ca ave t e o m, how ause for his 5 fail lure to comp with Rule 4(m). Plai ply e intiff’s respo onse to this O Order to Sho Cause shall be due by ow y 6 no later than May 15, 2017 M 7. 7 The Co CONTIN ourt NUES the ca managem confere ase ment ence schedul for May 5, 2017 to le 8 ne a m., arties’ joint c case manage ement confer rence statem shall be ment Jun 16, 2017 at 11:00 a.m and the pa 9 due on June 9, 2017. If Pla e aintiff has di ismissed Des Springs by that date it will not be required sert e, 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 to appear. a IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: May 1, 2017 ___ __________ ___________ __________ ________ JEF FFREY S. W WHITE Un nited States D District Judg ge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?