Ordonez v. Equifax, Inc. et al
Filing
30
ORDER to Show Cause. Signed by Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton on 07/24/2017. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2017)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
VIKKI ORDONEZ,
Case No. 17-cv-00391-PJH
Plaintiff,
6
7
v.
8
EQUIFAX, INC.,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Defendant.
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
On April 25, 2017, plaintiff Vikki Ordonez filed an amended complaint against
13
Equifax, Inc. (“Equifax”) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”). Dkt. 17. Ordonez
14
subsequently filed a notice of settlement with Chase, who was voluntarily dismissed as a
15
defendant. Dkt. 23, 29. However, Equifax remains as a defendant in this case.
16
The parties stipulated that Equifax need not file a response to the amended
17
complaint until June 15, 2017. Dkt. 26. However, more than a month later, Equifax still
18
has not filed an answer, a motion to dismiss, or another stipulation to extend the time to
19
respond. Plaintiff has not filed a motion for an entry of default.
20
In light of the foregoing, the court hereby ORDERS Equifax to SHOW CAUSE by
21
August 7, 2017 why a default should not be entered due to its failure to timely respond to
22
the complaint.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 24, 2017
__________________________________
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?