Harris et al v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.

Filing 73

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating 60 , 61 Joint Discovery Letter Briefs re: Strickland. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 STARVONA HARRIS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 BEST BUY STORES, L.P., ORDER REGARDING 7/27/17 JOINT LETTERS RE: PLAINTIFF STRICKLAND Re: Dkt. Nos. 60 & 61 Defendant. 11 United States District Court Northern District of California Case No. 4:17-cv-00446-HSG (KAW) 12 13 On July 27, 2017, the parties filed separate joint letters concerning the sufficiency of 14 Defendant Best Buy’s responses to Plaintiff Jonathan Strickland’s first set of interrogatories (Dkt. 15 No. 60) and his first set of requests for production of documents (Dkt. No. 61). 16 Currently, pending before the district court is a motion to dismiss all of Plaintiff’s claims 17 on res judicata grounds, given that he previously sued Best Buy in state court and lost. (Dkt. No. 18 61 at 5.) Furthermore, the undersigned ordered Best Buy to supplement its responses to Plaintiff 19 Harris’s special interrogatories and requests for production of documents, which should provide 20 Plaintiffs with sufficient information at this point in the pre-class certification stage. (See Dkt. No. 21 72.) 22 Accordingly, in an effort to conserve resources, the Court TERMINATES the Strickland 23 joint letters, and directs the parties to refile the dispute should the case survive the pending 24 motion. 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 8, 2017 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?