Harris et al v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
Filing
73
ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating 60 , 61 Joint Discovery Letter Briefs re: Strickland. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
STARVONA HARRIS, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
BEST BUY STORES, L.P.,
ORDER REGARDING 7/27/17 JOINT
LETTERS RE: PLAINTIFF
STRICKLAND
Re: Dkt. Nos. 60 & 61
Defendant.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Case No. 4:17-cv-00446-HSG (KAW)
12
13
On July 27, 2017, the parties filed separate joint letters concerning the sufficiency of
14
Defendant Best Buy’s responses to Plaintiff Jonathan Strickland’s first set of interrogatories (Dkt.
15
No. 60) and his first set of requests for production of documents (Dkt. No. 61).
16
Currently, pending before the district court is a motion to dismiss all of Plaintiff’s claims
17
on res judicata grounds, given that he previously sued Best Buy in state court and lost. (Dkt. No.
18
61 at 5.) Furthermore, the undersigned ordered Best Buy to supplement its responses to Plaintiff
19
Harris’s special interrogatories and requests for production of documents, which should provide
20
Plaintiffs with sufficient information at this point in the pre-class certification stage. (See Dkt. No.
21
72.)
22
Accordingly, in an effort to conserve resources, the Court TERMINATES the Strickland
23
joint letters, and directs the parties to refile the dispute should the case survive the pending
24
motion.
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 8, 2017
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?