Harris et al v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 67 MOTION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO PRODUCE AN EXPERT REPORT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
STARVONNA HARRIS, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
BEST BUY STORES, L.P.,
Case No. 17-cv-00446-HSG
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS'
DEADLINE TO PRODUCE AN EXPERT
Re: Dkt. No. 67
On August 31, 2017, Plaintiffs moved to extend their expert report deadline until 45 days
of Defendant’s production of information regarding putative class members, or to file a
supplemental report by that time. Dkt. No. 67 (“Mot.”). On September 14, 2017, Defendant filed
an opposition to the motion. Dkt. No. 74 (“Opp.”). Plaintiffs replied on September 21, 2017.
Dkt. No. 77. After considering these filings, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for an
extension to produce an expert report or for a supplemental expert report. Plaintiffs have failed to
show unfair prejudice in the absence of an extension or the opportunity to file an additional report.
See Mot. at 2–3; Opp. at 4–7. Plaintiffs also have not shown good cause for modifying the Court’s
Scheduling Order. See id.; Dkt. No. 44.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?