Harris et al v. Best Buy Stores, L.P.

Filing 93

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFFS' 67 MOTION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' DEADLINE TO PRODUCE AN EXPERT REPORT. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

STARVONNA HARRIS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

v.
BEST BUY STORES, L.P.,
Defendant.

Case No. 17-cv-00446-HSG
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS'
MOTION TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS'
DEADLINE TO PRODUCE AN EXPERT
REPORT
Re: Dkt. No. 67

12
13

On August 31, 2017, Plaintiffs moved to extend their expert report deadline until 45 days

14

of Defendant’s production of information regarding putative class members, or to file a

15

supplemental report by that time. Dkt. No. 67 (“Mot.”). On September 14, 2017, Defendant filed

16

an opposition to the motion. Dkt. No. 74 (“Opp.”). Plaintiffs replied on September 21, 2017.

17

Dkt. No. 77. After considering these filings, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ request for an

18

extension to produce an expert report or for a supplemental expert report. Plaintiffs have failed to

19

show unfair prejudice in the absence of an extension or the opportunity to file an additional report.

20

See Mot. at 2–3; Opp. at 4–7. Plaintiffs also have not shown good cause for modifying the Court’s

21

Scheduling Order. See id.; Dkt. No. 44.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 10/31/2017
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge