Allen v. County of Sonoma, et al

Filing 25

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss; denying Motion to Strike as moot. Amended Pleadings due by 6/30/2017. (fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 JOHNNY VANCE ALLEN, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: 4:17-CV-00448-YGR ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING TO MOTION TO STRIKE vs. 13 14 15 16 17 18 COUNTY OF SONOMA, a governmental entity; SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, a governmental entity; KYLE PETERSON, a person; TRENT HARDEMAN, a person; LAWRENCE MATELLI, a person; and TWENTY UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA AND/OR SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 The County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff’s Office, Kyle Peterson, Trent Hardeman and Lawrence Matelli (collectively “defendants”) filed their Motion to Dismiss on March 30, 2017. (Dkt. No. 16.) Plaintiff Allen filed his responsive brief on April 13, 2017. (Dkt. No. 17.) Defendants filed their reply in support of the motion to dismiss on April 20, 2017. (Dkt. No. 20.) Defendants further requested that plaintiff’s allegations regarding violation of equal protection be 25 stricken. The matter came on for hearing on May 16, 2017. 26 27 28 Having carefully considered the pleadings and the papers submitted on this motion, and the hearing held on May 16, 2017, for the reasons stated on the record on May 16, 2017, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss. Plaintiff is granted leave to amend and shall file an 1 amended complaint by June 30, 2017. Defendants’ motion to strike is DENIED as moot. 2 This Order terminates Dkt. No. 16. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 17, 2017 _________________________________ YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?