Shaw v. Thomas et al

Filing 46

ORDER by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers granting 43 Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File a Dispositive Motion. Dispositive Motion filed by 1/15/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(fs, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEWIS DOMINIC SHAW, Case No. 17-cv-00462-YGR (PR) 12 13 v. 14 15 16 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE A DISPOSITIVE MOTION L. THOMAS, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Defendants N. Adam, D. Alpaugh, B. Fellows, D. George, N. Ikegbu, D. Jacobsen, 19 M. McLean, S. Risenhoover, M. Sayre, L. Thomas, and D. Venes (Defendants) filed a motion to 20 change the Court’s deadline to file a dispositive motion, from November 14, 2017 to January 15, 21 2018. The Court has read and considered Defendants’ motion and the accompanying declaration 22 of counsel, and finds that good cause exists to grant the motion. 23 Accordingly, Defendants’ motion to change time to file a dispositive motion is GRANTED. 24 The time for Defendants to file their motion is changed to January 15, 2018. Plaintiff’s 25 opposition to Defendants’ motion must be served and filed no more than twenty-eight (28) days 26 after the Defendants’ motion is served and filed. Defendants’ reply, if any must be served and 27 filed no more than fourteen (14) days after Plaintiff’s opposition is entered in the Court’s docket. 28 1 1 The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply is filed. 2 The Court notes that this is the first extension in this case. The granting of regular requests 3 4 for extension should not be expected. IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 8 Dated: ___________________________ November 17, 2017 __________________________ THE HONORABLE YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?