Ewers v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 19

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 5/19/17. Show Cause Response due by 5/30/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/19/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES D D DISTRICT C COURT 5 NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI RN CT IFORNIA 6 7 ALTURA ST. MICHAEL EWERS, A L Plaintiff, 8 9 10 11 Case No. 1 17-cv-00592 2-JSW ORDER T SHOW C TO CAUSE WH CASE HY SHOULD NOT BE D DISMISSED FOR D FAILURE TO PROSECUTE E v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN C F FR RANCISCO et al., O, United States District Court Northern District of California Defendants s. 12 13 14 15 ase duled for a case manage c ement confer rence on Ma 19, 2017, at 11:00 ay This ca was sched a.m Plaintiff did not appear for that he m. d earing, and t Court co the ontinued the matter to Ju 9, 2017. une This is not the first time Plaintiff has failed to appear fo a schedule proceedin On May d or ed ng. y 16 16, 2017, Plain did not appear for a scheduled A , ntiff a ADR telecon nference. (Se Dkt. No. 17.) ee 17 Pla aintiff also did not file a case manage ement statem ment. 18 Plaintif is HEREBY ORDERE TO SHO CAUSE why the Cou should no dismiss ff ED OW urt ot 19 this case for fai s ilure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Pl F laintiff’s resp ponse to this Order to s 20 Sho Cause sh be due by May 30, 2017. If Plai ow hall b 2 intiff fails to file a timely response b that date, o y by 21 the Court shall dismiss this case pursua to Rule 4 e s ant 41(b), and Pl laintiff is her reby advised that such a d 22 dis smissal will “operate[] as an adjudica “ s ation on the merits.” Fe R. Civ. P. 41(b). ed. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDER S RED. Da ated: May 19 2017 9, ___ __________ ___________ __________ ________ JEF FFREY S. W WHITE Un nited States D District Judg ge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?