Azad et al v. Tokio Marine HCC - Medical Insurance Services Group et al
Order by Hon. Phyllis J. Hamilton granting 87 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiffs to File First Amended Complaint. (pjhlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2017)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MOHAMMED AZAD, et al.,
Case No. 17-cv-00618-PJH
TOKIO MARINE HCC - MEDICAL
INSURANCE SERVICES GROUP, et al.,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO
EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO
FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPAINT
Re: Dkt. No. 87
United States District Court
Northern District of California
On July 14, 2017, the court granted the various motions to dismiss in this matter,
with leave to amend. Dkt. 86. The court ordered that “[p]laintiffs shall file an amended
complaint by August 7, 2017. No additional claims or parties may be added without leave
of court or stipulation of defendants.” Id. at 18.
Before the court is a stipulation to extend the deadline for plaintiffs to file an
amended complaint to August 21, 2017, with the response from defendants due
September 18, 2017. Dkt. 87. The court GRANTS the request to extend these
However, the stipulation notes that “due to the tentative settlement of the claims of
[the two named plaintiffs],” plaintiffs’ counsel intend to substitute “new Plaintiffs and
proposed Class Representatives.” The court’s prior order does not permit the addition of
new parties without consent of defendants or leave of court. Thus, if plaintiffs intend to
add or substitute new class representatives, they must either obtain the consent of the
defendants, or file a motion for leave of court by the deadline.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 7, 2017
PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?