Moralez v. Darakar, Inc. et al

Filing 23

THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE to Plaintiff. Show Cause Response due by 5/23/2018. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/9/2018. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2018)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FRANCISCA MORALEZ, Plaintiff, 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 Case No. 17-cv-00648-KAW THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. DARAKAR, INC., et al., Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff Francisca Moralez filed her complaint in this action on February 9, 2017. The last 14 day for the joint inspection of premises was May 25, 2017, and the Plaintiff's notice of need of 15 mediation was due within 42 days of the joint site inspection. (See Scheduling Order at 1, Dkt. 16 No. 4; General Order 56 ¶ 7.) Plaintiff did not file a notice of need of mediation, and on 17 September 14, 2017, the Court issued an order to show cause, requiring Plaintiff to explain why 18 the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 16.) 19 That same day, Plaintiff filed a response, stating that the parties had discussed a potential 20 resolution and that she had exchanged an initial settlement agreement with one of the Defendants. 21 (Dkt. No. 16 ¶¶ 4, 6-7.) Plaintiff also stated that she would meet and confer with Defendants 22 about a stipulation for administrative relief from the deadlines. (Id. ¶ 13.) 23 On October 3, 2017, the Court discharged the order to show cause. (Dkt. No. 17.) The 24 Court noted, however, that Plaintiff had not filed a stipulation for administrative relief from the 25 deadlines, and ordered Plaintiff to file a request or stipulation and proposed order for 26 administrative relief from the deadlines within 14 days of the order. (Id. at 2.) The Court stated 27 that the request for administrative relief need not be filed if Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement of 28 the entire case. (Id.) 1 Plaintiff did not file a request or stipulation and proposed order for administrative relief. 2 On November 15, 2017, the Court issued a second order to show cause, again requiring Plaintiff to 3 show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and ordering Plaintiff to 4 file a request and proposed order for administrative relief from the deadlines. (Dkt. No. 18.) 5 On December 6, 2017, Plaintiff filed an untimely response to the November 15, 2017 order 6 to show cause. (Dkt. No. 19.) Plaintiff stated that the parties were still working on settling the 7 case, but that due to uncertainty about the future of the subject property, "the case has languished." 8 (Id. ¶¶ 11, 13, 15.) Plaintiff thus requested a "brief continuance" to allow her to file for 9 administrative relief. (Id. ¶ 17.) 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 On December 8, 2017, the Court discharged the second order to show cause, and ordered Plaintiff to file a request or stipulation and proposed order for administrative relief by December 15, 2017. (Dkt. No. 20.) On December 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed a request for administrative relief, stating that the settlement agreement had not been fully executed and requesting additional time. (Dkt. No. 21.) On December 19, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff's request and extended the deadline for filing the notice of need for mediation to March 19, 2018. As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has again failed to file a notice of need for mediation or request for administrative relief. Accordingly, the Court again ORDERS Plaintiff to show cause, by May 23, 2018, (1) explaining why this case should not be dismissed for failure to 18 prosecute, (2) explaining why Plaintiff's counsel should not be sanctioned $500.00 for repeatedly 19 failing to comply with court orders, and (3) filing a request or stipulation and proposed order for 20 administrative relief from the deadlines or, in the alternative, a notice of settlement of the entire 21 22 23 24 case. Failure to timely complete all tasks by the deadline will result in dismissal of the case and imposition of sanctions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 9, 2018 25 __________________________________ KANDIS A. WESTMORE United States Magistrate Judge 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?