Moralez v. Darakar, Inc. et al
Filing
23
THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE to Plaintiff. Show Cause Response due by 5/23/2018. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 5/9/2018. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/9/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
FRANCISCA MORALEZ,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
Case No. 17-cv-00648-KAW
THIRD ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
DARAKAR, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
12
13
Plaintiff Francisca Moralez filed her complaint in this action on February 9, 2017. The last
14
day for the joint inspection of premises was May 25, 2017, and the Plaintiff's notice of need of
15
mediation was due within 42 days of the joint site inspection. (See Scheduling Order at 1, Dkt.
16
No. 4; General Order 56 ¶ 7.) Plaintiff did not file a notice of need of mediation, and on
17
September 14, 2017, the Court issued an order to show cause, requiring Plaintiff to explain why
18
the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 16.)
19
That same day, Plaintiff filed a response, stating that the parties had discussed a potential
20
resolution and that she had exchanged an initial settlement agreement with one of the Defendants.
21
(Dkt. No. 16 ¶¶ 4, 6-7.) Plaintiff also stated that she would meet and confer with Defendants
22
about a stipulation for administrative relief from the deadlines. (Id. ¶ 13.)
23
On October 3, 2017, the Court discharged the order to show cause. (Dkt. No. 17.) The
24
Court noted, however, that Plaintiff had not filed a stipulation for administrative relief from the
25
deadlines, and ordered Plaintiff to file a request or stipulation and proposed order for
26
administrative relief from the deadlines within 14 days of the order. (Id. at 2.) The Court stated
27
that the request for administrative relief need not be filed if Plaintiff filed a notice of settlement of
28
the entire case. (Id.)
1
Plaintiff did not file a request or stipulation and proposed order for administrative relief.
2
On November 15, 2017, the Court issued a second order to show cause, again requiring Plaintiff to
3
show cause why the case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute, and ordering Plaintiff to
4
file a request and proposed order for administrative relief from the deadlines. (Dkt. No. 18.)
5
On December 6, 2017, Plaintiff filed an untimely response to the November 15, 2017 order
6
to show cause. (Dkt. No. 19.) Plaintiff stated that the parties were still working on settling the
7
case, but that due to uncertainty about the future of the subject property, "the case has languished."
8
(Id. ¶¶ 11, 13, 15.) Plaintiff thus requested a "brief continuance" to allow her to file for
9
administrative relief. (Id. ¶ 17.)
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
On December 8, 2017, the Court discharged the second order to show cause, and ordered
Plaintiff to file a request or stipulation and proposed order for administrative relief by December
15, 2017. (Dkt. No. 20.) On December 15, 2017, Plaintiff filed a request for administrative relief,
stating that the settlement agreement had not been fully executed and requesting additional time.
(Dkt. No. 21.) On December 19, 2017, the Court granted Plaintiff's request and extended the
deadline for filing the notice of need for mediation to March 19, 2018.
As of the date of this order, Plaintiff has again failed to file a notice of need for mediation
or request for administrative relief. Accordingly, the Court again ORDERS Plaintiff to show
cause, by May 23, 2018, (1) explaining why this case should not be dismissed for failure to
18
prosecute, (2) explaining why Plaintiff's counsel should not be sanctioned $500.00 for repeatedly
19
failing to comply with court orders, and (3) filing a request or stipulation and proposed order for
20
administrative relief from the deadlines or, in the alternative, a notice of settlement of the entire
21
22
23
24
case. Failure to timely complete all tasks by the deadline will result in dismissal of the case and
imposition of sanctions.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 9, 2018
25
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?