Drew v. Avalon Bay Communites Inc.
Filing
14
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 7/13/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on July 6, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
ROBERT RUSSELL DREW,
Case No. 17-cv-00846-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
AVALON BAY COMMUNITIES INC.,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE
Defendant.
12
On February 21, 2017, Pro se Plaintiff Robert Russell Drew (“Plaintiff”) filed suit in this
13
Court. [Docket No. 1]. Plaintiff has failed to comply with a number of case-management
14
deadlines. For example, Plaintiff has yet to serve the summons and complaint, even though the
15
court reminded him of the service requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
16
[Docket No. 12]. Additionally, Plaintiff has twice failed to submit the required Case Management
17
Conference Statement. [Docket Nos. 11, 12]. Plaintiff also failed to appear at the July 5, 2017
18
Initial Case Management Conference. [Docket No. 13].
19
In light of the above, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond in writing by July 13, 2017
20
and explain why his case should not be dismissed prejudice for failure to prosecute. Failure to
21
timely respond may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.
R NIA
. Ryu
onna M
Judge D
ER
FO
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge
H
28
RT
27
NO
26
DERED
SO OR
______________________________________
IT IS
LI
25
Dated: July 6, 2017
A
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
23
S
22
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?