Drew v. Avalon Bay Communites Inc.

Filing 15

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE. Show Cause Response due by 7/13/2017.Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on July 6, 2017. (dmrlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2017)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

ROBERT RUSSELL DREW,

Case No. 17-cv-00846-DMR

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

AVALON BAY COMMUNITIES INC.,
Defendant.

AMENDED ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO
PROSECUTE

12

On February 21, 2017, Pro se Plaintiff Robert Russell Drew (“Plaintiff”) filed suit in this

13

Court. [Docket No. 1]. Plaintiff has failed to comply with a number of case-management

14

deadlines. For example, Plaintiff has yet to serve the summons and complaint, even though the

15

court reminded him of the service requirements set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).

16

[Docket No. 12]. Additionally, Plaintiff has twice failed to submit the required Case Management

17

Conference Statement. [Docket Nos. 11, 12]. Plaintiff also failed to appear at the July 5, 2017

18

Initial Case Management Conference. [Docket No. 13].

19

In light of the above, the court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond in writing by July 13, 2017

20

and explain why his case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute.

21

Failure to timely respond may result in dismissal of this action without prejudice.

22

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT

ER

M. Ryu

R NIA

onna
Judge D

H

28

NO

27

FO

26

D

______________________________________
RDERE
S SO O
IT I
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judge

LI

25

Dated: July 6, 2017

A

24

RT
U
O

23

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C