Abreu v. Binkele
Filing
11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/20/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
ARMANDO ABREU,
Petitioner,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
Case No. 17-cv-00870-HSG (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
R. BINKELE,
Respondent.
15
16
On February 22, 2017, petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas
17
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That same day, the court sent a notification to petitioner,
18
informing him that he did not pay the filing fee, nor did he file a complete application to proceed
19
in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The court provided petitioner with a blank IFP application, along with
20
a notification that the case would be dismissed if petitioner failed to pay the fee, or file a
21
completed application with supporting documentation within twenty-eight days. More than
22
twenty-eight days have passed, and petitioner has not paid the filing fee. Petitioner also has not
23
filed a completed application to proceed IFP.
24
25
26
Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter
judgment and close the file.
The Court notes that petitioner has filed two documents entitled “Notice of Appeal” in this
27
action. It appears that petitioner may be trying to appeal the dismissal of his petition in Case No.
28
C 17-0117 JCS (PR). If that is the case, petitioner should move to dismiss the appeal in this action
1
pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42 and re-file his notice of appeal using the
2
caption and civil case number in C 17-0117 JCS (PR).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 4/20/2017
5
6
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?