Abreu v. Binkele

Filing 11

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ***Civil Case Terminated.*** Signed by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. on 4/20/2017. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/20/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ARMANDO ABREU, Petitioner, United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 Case No. 17-cv-00870-HSG (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. R. BINKELE, Respondent. 15 16 On February 22, 2017, petitioner, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of habeas 17 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. That same day, the court sent a notification to petitioner, 18 informing him that he did not pay the filing fee, nor did he file a complete application to proceed 19 in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The court provided petitioner with a blank IFP application, along with 20 a notification that the case would be dismissed if petitioner failed to pay the fee, or file a 21 completed application with supporting documentation within twenty-eight days. More than 22 twenty-eight days have passed, and petitioner has not paid the filing fee. Petitioner also has not 23 filed a completed application to proceed IFP. 24 25 26 Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. The Court notes that petitioner has filed two documents entitled “Notice of Appeal” in this 27 action. It appears that petitioner may be trying to appeal the dismissal of his petition in Case No. 28 C 17-0117 JCS (PR). If that is the case, petitioner should move to dismiss the appeal in this action 1 pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42 and re-file his notice of appeal using the 2 caption and civil case number in C 17-0117 JCS (PR). 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 4/20/2017 5 6 HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?