Small et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 18 Joint Stipulation to Postpone Case Management Deadlines. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/24/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
CROWELL & MORING LLP
Kevin C. Mayer (CSB No. 118177)
Email: kmayer@crowell.com
3 Embarcadero Center, 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone:
415.986.2800
Facsimile:
415.986.2827
Andrew D. Kaplan (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
Email: akaplan@crowell.com
Rebecca B. Chaney (Pro hac vice application to be filed)
Email: rchaney@crowell.com
1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004
Telephone: 202.624.2500
Facsimile:
202.628.5116
9
Attorneys for Defendants Cordis Corporation and Cardinal Health, Inc.
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
OAKLAND DIVISION
13
14
RONALD SMALL, et al.,
Case No. 4:17-cv-00881-HSG
15
Plaintiffs,
16
v.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
STIPULATION TO POSTPONE CASE
MANAGEMENT DEADLINES
17
CORDIS CORPORATION, et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION
TO POSTPONE CASE MANAGEMENT DEADLINES;
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00881-HSG
1
WHERE
EAS, on cons
sideration of the parties’ Joint Stipul
f
’
lation to Pos
stpone Case
2
Management Deadlines, and for good cause show the Cour hereby pos
M
d
wn,
rt
stpones all p
pending
3
fe
ederal court case management deadl
lines in this a
action until r
resolution of the administrative
f
4
motion in this case.
m
s
5
6
PURSUA
ANT TO ST
TIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED
N,
O
D
7
8
Dated: May 24, 2017
D
Hon. Hay
ywood S. Gi
illiam, Jr.
United St
tates District Judge
t
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWE
ELL
& M ORIN LLP
NG
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
-1-
[P
PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOIN STIPULATION
R
NT
TO POSTPONE C
CASE MANAGEME
ENT DEADLINES;
CASE NO. 4:1
17-CV-00881-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?