Stetler et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
Filing
51
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 50 Stipulation to Withdraw Notice and Opposition [Dkts 47 and 48]. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2017) Modified on 4/6/2017 to correct typo (ndrS, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
LISA STETLER, AND ARTURO DIAZ
and JOSIE DIAZ, AND SANDRA
DEHN,
Plaintiffs,
13
14
15
16
17
CASE NO. 4:17-cv-00895-HSG
ORDER TO WITHDRAW NOTICE
AND OPPOSITION [DKTS 47 AND
48]
v.
MCKESSON CORPORATION, a
corporation; and BRISTOL-MYERS
SQUIBB Company; and PFIZER INC., a
corporation; AND DOES 1 through100,
INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN DIEGO
EAST\141538469.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO WITHDRAW
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00895-HSG
1
Before the Court is the stipulation of Plaintiffs Lisa Stetler, Arturo Diaz,
2
Josie Diaz, and Sandra Dehn (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendants Bristol-Myers Squibb
3
Company and Pfizer Inc. (“Defendants”) to withdraw two docket entries, Docket 47
4
and 48, from the Court’s record.
5
Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation and finding good cause for the
6
stipulated relief, the Court enters this order on the stipulation. The Court has not
7
and will not consider Docket Nos. 47 and 48, and both shall be deemed withdrawn.
8
The clerk of the court is directed to withdraw or lock the entries, as appropriate.
9
Instead, the parties have attached the order of Judge Morrison C. England in Stark
10
11
et al., v. McKesson Corp., et al., 2:17-cv- 00095-MCE-CKD to the stipulation.
[Alternatively: The Court has already considered, or intends to consider,
12
Docket Entries 47 and/or 48, and on that basis, declines to withdraw them from the
13
record.]
14
15
Dated: April 6, 2017
By:
16
HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR.
United States District Court Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DLA P IPER LLP (US)
SAN DIEGO
-1EAST\141538469.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO WITHDRAW
CASE NO. 4:17-CV-00895-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?