Wyche v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 33 Stipulation Re: Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/27/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 GREGORY C. CHENG, CA Bar No. 226865 gregory.cheng@ogletree.com ZACHARY W. SHINE, CA Bar No. 271522 zachary.shine@ogletree.com OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. Steuart Tower, Suite 1300 One Market Plaza San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: 415.442.4810 Facsimile: 415.442.4870 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. 8 ASHWIN LADVA, CA Bar No. 206140 LADVA LAW FIRM 9 530 Jackson Street, 2nd Floor San Francisco, California 94133 10 Telephone: 415.296.8844 Facsimile: 415.296.8847 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff 12 BEVERLY WYCHE 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 BEVERLY WYCHE, an individual, 17 18 Plaintiff, vs. 19 THE HOME DEPOT, and DOES 1 through 25, 20 inclusive, 21 Case No. 4:17-cv-01058-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Action Filed: January 30, 2017 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 4:17-cv-01058-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Plaintiff Beverly Wyche 2 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. (“Home Depot”) (collectively “the Parties”), 3 by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and request that the entire above- 4 captioned action be dismissed with prejudice, with each side to bear its own costs and fees. The 5 Parties further stipulate and request that Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. of the United States District 6 Court for the Northern District of California or his successor retain jurisdiction to enforce the 7 provisions of the Settlement Agreement and General Release (“Agreement”) and over any matters 8 or actions brought to enforce the Agreement. 9 10 11 DATED: September 27, 2017 12 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 13 14 By: /s/ Zachary W. Shine GREGORY C. CHENG ZACHARY W. SHINE 15 16 Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC 17 18 19 DATED: September 27, 2107 LADVA LAW FIRM 20 21 22 23 By: /s/ Ashwin Ladva ASHWIN LADVA Attorneys for Plaintiff BEVERLY WYCHE 24 25 26 27 28 1 Case No. 4:17-cv-01058-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 3 document has been obtained from the other signatories. 4 DATED: September 27, 2017 5 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C. 6 7 By: 8 9 10 /s/ Zachary W. Shine GREGORY C. CHENG ZACHARY W. SHINE Attorneys for Defendant HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No. 4:17-cv-01058-HSG STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 2 3 OR RDER OF TH COURT HE T Pursuant to the Stipu t ulation And [Proposed O Order] by and between P d Plaintiff Beve Wyche erly and Defendant Home Depot U.S.A., Inc and good cause appea d H c., aring to the C Court: 4 IT IS HE EREBY OR RDERED tha the matter is dismissed with prejud in its en at d dice ntirety, in 5 acco ordance with the terms of the Stipula h o ation. Each party shall b its own fees and costs. This bear 6 Cou shall retain jurisdictio to enforce the provisi urt on e ions of the Settlement Agreement an General nd 7 Release (“Agree ement”) and over any matters or acti d m ions brought to enforce the Agreeme t ent. Beverly y 8 Wyc v. Home Depot USA, Inc., Case No. 4:17-cv che e N v-01058-HSG is hereby dismissed. G, 9 IT SO ORDERED. O 10 11 12 DATED: Septem mber 27, 2017 H HONORABL HAYWO LE OOD S. GILL LIAM JR. U United States District Co Judge s ourt 13 14 15 16 17 31259085.1 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 C Case No. 4:17-cv-01058-HSG G STIPU ULATION AN ORDER RE DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WIT PREJUDIC ND E: L E TH CE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?