Amundsen v. Comcast Corporation et al

Filing 16

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 11 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Douglas Amundsen CASE No C 17-CV-01302-HSG Plaintiffs) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS V. Comcast Corporation, et al. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: 0 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADRL.R. 6. To request an Sl Mediation (ADRL.R. 6) early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for 0 Private ADR (specify process and provider) ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 andADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: D the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered.) S] other requested deadline: 10/6/17 Date: 5/23/17 David C. King Attorney for Plaintiff Date: 5/23/17 Brian H. Chun Attorney for Defendant a IT IS so ORDERED X D IT IS so ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: Date: 6/27/2017 u.s. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE lniporKml! E-flle this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation " or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE" or "Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR. " Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that a copy of this document was served electronically on May 23, 2017, on counsel of record in compliance with Federal Rule 5, Local Rule 5.6 and General Order 45, by use of the Court's ECF system. /s/ Denise Taylor

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?