United States of America v. Brinskele et al
Filing
82
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Claudia Wilken denying 80 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Renewed Motion to Set Aside the Default due by 3/27/2024.(tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2024)Any non-CM/ECF Participants have been served by First Class Mail to the addresses of record listed on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
12
Case No. 17-cv-01410 CW
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
DISMISS WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Dkt. No. 80
EDWARD A. BRINSKELE, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
On March 9, 2024, Defendant Edward A. Brinskele filed a motion to dismiss. See Docket
17
No. 80. The Court DENIES the motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE because Edward A. Brinskele is
18
in default.
19
On February 28, 2024, the Court denied without prejudice Edward A. Brinskele’s motion
20
to set aside the default for failure to show good cause under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(c).
21
See Docket No. 79. The Court permitted Defendant Edward A. Brinskele to file a renewed motion
22
to set aside the default by March 13, 2024. The Court will extend the deadline for Edward A.
23
Brinskele to file a renewed motion to set aside the default to March 27, 2024.
24
In any such motion, Edward A. Brinskele must demonstrate good cause to set aside the
25
default. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c). To establish good cause, Edward A. Brinskele must show: (1)
26
that he did not engage in culpable conduct that led to the default; (2) that he has a meritorious
27
defense; and (3) that reopening the default would not prejudice the United States. See Franchise
28
Holding II, LLC. v. Huntington Restaurants Grp., Inc., 375 F.3d 922, 926 (9th Cir. 2004).
1
2
Civil Local Rule 7-5, which governs motions and requires that factual contentions in support of
3
any motion be supported by an affidavit or declaration and with appropriate references to the
4
record. Those rules can be accessed at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/rules/civil-local-rules/.
5
The Court reminds Edward A. Brinskele that he is required to comply with this Court’s
6
orders, as well as all applicable procedural rules, including the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
7
and the Civil Local Rules, even if he is not represented by counsel. A failure by any party to
8
comply with applicable rules may result in sanctions.
9
United States District Court
Northern District of California
The motion must comply with the requirements of the local rules of this district, including
Edward A. Brinskele may consult the Legal Help Center and pro se resources. The Legal
10
Help Center can provide information, advice, and basic legal help but cannot represent litigants.
11
Telephone appointments can be scheduled by emailing fedpro@sfbar.org or by calling (415) 782-
12
8982. Additional information can be found online at https://www.cand.uscourts.gov/pro-se-
13
litigants/.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
Dated: March 11, 2024
CLAUDIA WILKEN
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?