Adela E. Gomez v. Nancy A. Berryhill

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER re 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Adela E. Gomez. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Opposition due by 12/20/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 11/8/17. (sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/8/2017)

1
2
3

Jared T. Walker (SB#269029)
1104 Corporate Way
Sacramento, CA 95831
T: [phone]
F: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5

Attorney for Plaintiff,
ADELA E. GOMEZ

6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

ADELA E. GOMEZ,

10

Plaintiff,

11
12

Case No.: 17-cv-01473-KAW

v.

JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO AMEND SCHDULING ORDER

NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Commissioner of Social Security,

13
Defendant.
14
15
Plaintiff Adela E. Gomez and defendant Commissioner of Social Security, through their

16
17

counsels of record, jointly request to amend the Court’s Scheduling Order in this action as follows.

18

IT IS STIPULATED, that the untimely filing of plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment

19

(ECF doc. #17) is the result of plaintiff’s counsel’s excusable neglect and, pursuant to Rule 6(b) of

20

the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, should be accepted for filing in that counsel’s delay has not

21

caused prejudice to defendant or materially impacted these proceedings. It is further stipulated that

22

defendant’s deadline to respond to plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment be extended through

23

December 20, 2017. Based on the delay caused by plaintiff’s counsel, defendant requires additional

24

time to respond to plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment due to conflicting obligations and

25

deadlines in unrelated matters.

26

///

27

///

28

///

JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER

1

Dated: November 7, 2017

Respectfully submitted,

2
3

/s/ Jared T. Walker
Jared T. Walker,
Attorney for Plaintiff

4
5

SO STIPULATED:
BRIAN J. STRETCH
United States Attorney

6
7
8

Dated: November 7, 2017

9
10

By:

/s/ */s/ Richard M. Rodriguez
(*authorized by e-mail on 11/7/2017)
Richard M. Rodriguez
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

11
12
13
14

ORDER
Based on the stipulation of the parties, IT IS ORDERED that defendant shall respond to
plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF doc. 17) on or before December 20, 2017.

15
16
17

Dated: 11/8/17

_
HON. KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2JOINT STIPULATION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER