Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa
Filing
43
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244)
ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. (SBN 251245)
ACE T. TATE, ESQ. (SBN 262015)
MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT
A Professional Corporation
1912 “I” Street
Sacramento, California 95811
Telephone: (916) 446-4692
Facsimile: (916) 447-4614
davidm@mastagni.com
istevens@mastagni.com
atate@mastagni.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
TIMOTHY ABOUDARA, JR. et al.
11
Plaintiffs,
12
v.
13
CITY OF SANTA ROSA,
14
Defendant.
15
16
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 17-CV-01661-HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY AT MOTION
HEARING
Date: August 31, 2017
Time: 2:00 p.m.
Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
Oakland Courthouse
Courtroom 2 – 4th Floor
1301 Clay Street
Oakland, CA 94612
The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ request for their counsel to appear by telephone on
19
August 31, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. for hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification and
20
Facilitated Notice Pursuant to U.S.C. § 216(b), and has found the request supported by good
21
cause. Plaintiffs’ request to appear by telephone is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ counsel is directed to
22
contact CourtCall Remote Court Appearances at (866) 582-6878, in advance of the hearing to
23
finalize their appearance. Counsel shall adhere to CourtCall’s procedures.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED:
25
28
Dated: August ___, 2017
26
_________________________________
HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER TO APPEAR
TELEPHONICALLY AT HEARING
1
Aboudara, et. al. v. City of Santa Rosa
Case No. 17-CV-01661-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?