Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa

Filing 43

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 42 Motion to Appear by Telephone. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 DAVID E. MASTAGNI, ESQ. (SBN 204244) ISAAC S. STEVENS, ESQ. (SBN 251245) ACE T. TATE, ESQ. (SBN 262015) MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT A Professional Corporation 1912 “I” Street Sacramento, California 95811 Telephone: (916) 446-4692 Facsimile: (916) 447-4614 davidm@mastagni.com istevens@mastagni.com atate@mastagni.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY ABOUDARA, JR. et al. 11 Plaintiffs, 12 v. 13 CITY OF SANTA ROSA, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 17-CV-01661-HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT MOTION HEARING Date: August 31, 2017 Time: 2:00 p.m. Judge: Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Oakland Courthouse Courtroom 2 – 4th Floor 1301 Clay Street Oakland, CA 94612 The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs’ request for their counsel to appear by telephone on 19 August 31, 2017, at 2:00 p.m. for hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Conditional Certification and 20 Facilitated Notice Pursuant to U.S.C. § 216(b), and has found the request supported by good 21 cause. Plaintiffs’ request to appear by telephone is GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ counsel is directed to 22 contact CourtCall Remote Court Appearances at (866) 582-6878, in advance of the hearing to 23 finalize their appearance. Counsel shall adhere to CourtCall’s procedures. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED: 25 28 Dated: August ___, 2017 26 _________________________________ HONORABLE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT HEARING 1 Aboudara, et. al. v. City of Santa Rosa Case No. 17-CV-01661-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?