Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa

Filing 94

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 93 Stipulation Granting 88 Administrative Motion to Expedite Hearing on Defendant's Motion to Stay Proceedings re 87 MOTION to Stay Proceedings Pending Administrative Rulemaking. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2018)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

ARTHUR A. HARTINGER (SBN 121521)
[e-mail]
LINDA M. ROSS (SBN 133874)
[e-mail]
SPENCER J. WILSON (SBN 266938)
[e-mail]
RYAN McGINLEY-STEMPEL (SBN 296182)
[e-mail]
RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP®
350 Sansome Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SANTA ROSA

9
10
11

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

TIMOTHY ABOUDARA, JR. et al.

15

Case No. 4:17-cv-01661-HSG

Plaintiffs,

16

v.

17

CITY OF SANTA ROSA,

18

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING
EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE
(Dkt. No. 90); ORDER

Defendant.

Action filed: March 27, 2017
Trial date: September 10, 2018

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG

1
2
3
4
5

WHEREAS on June 14, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending
Administrative Rulemaking (the “Motion to Stay,” Dkt. 87);
WHEREAS the hearing on Defendant’s Motion to Stay is set for September 13, 2018, at
2:00 p.m.;
WHEREAS on June 14, 2018, Defendant filed an Administrative Motion to Expedite the Hearing

6

on the Stay Motion (the “Administrative Motion to Expedite Hearing,” Dkt. 88) so that it may be heard

7

concurrently with Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 67), which is already set to be heard

8

on July 19, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.;

9

WHEREAS on June 15, 2018, the Court directed the Plaintiffs to file either an opposition or a

10

statement of non-opposition to Defendant’s Administrative Motion to Expedite Hearing and directed the

11

parties to meet and confer and to submit a proposed expedited briefing schedule on Defendant’s Motion

12

to Stay (Dkt. 90);

13
14
15
16
17
18
19

WHEREAS on June 18, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant’s
Administrative Motion to Expedite (Dkt. 92);
WHEREAS the parties met and conferred in accordance with the Court’s order and have reached
a proposed expedited briefing schedule that accommodates defense counsel’s pre-planned vacations;
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their counsel of record,
subject to the approval of the Court, that
1.

20
21
22

Plaintiffs shall file their opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay on or before
July 3, 2018.

2.

Defendant shall file any reply in support of its Motion to Stay on or before July 12,
2018.

23

The parties do not seek to modify any other deadlines in the scheduling order at this time.

24

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

25
26
27
28
-2JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG

1

RENNE PUBLIC LAW GROUP®

Dated: June 18, 2018

2

By: /s/ Arthur A. Hartinger
Arthur A. Hartinger

3

Attorneys for Defendant
CITY OF SANTA ROSA

4
5
6

MASTAGNI HOLSTEDT, A.P.C.

Dated: June 18, 2018

7

By: /s/ Ian B. Sangster
Ian B. Sangster

8
9

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
TIMOTHY ABOUDARA, JR. et al.

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG

1
2

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1
Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document

3

has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

4

Dated: June 18, 2018

/s/ Arthur A. Hartinger
Arthur A. Hartinger

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-

JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (DKT. NO. 90); ORDER CASE NO. 4:17-CV-01661-HSG

1

ORDER
R

2

Pursuant to th foregoing stipulation and good ca
he
g
ause appearin it is here ORDERE that:
ng,
eby
ED

3

1. Defen
ndant’s Adm
ministrative Motion to Ex
M
xpedite the H
Hearing on it Motion to Stay
ts

4
5

Proceedings Pend
ding Adminis
strative Rule
emaking (Dk 88), is gra
kt.
anted.
2. The hearing on De
efendant’s Motion to Sta Proceedin Pending Administra
M
ay
ngs
g
ative

6

Rulem
making (Dkt. 87, the “Mo
.
otion to Stay currently set for Sep
y”),
y
ptember 13, 2
2018, is

7

hereby reschedule for July 19, 2018, at 2
y
ed
2:00 p.m.

8
9
10
0

3. Plaint
tiffs shall file their oppos
e
sition to Def
fendant’s Mo
otion to Stay on or befor July 3,
y
re
2018.
4. Defen
ndant shall fi any reply in support o its Motion to Stay on or before Ju 12, 2018.
ile
y
of
n
uly
.

11
12
2

PURSUANT TO STIPUL
LATION, IT IS SO ORD
T
DERED.

13
3
14
4

Dated: Ju 19, 2018
une
8
Hon. Ha
aywood S. G
Gilliam, Jr.
U.S. DIS
STRICT CO
OURT JUDG
GE

15
5
16
6
17
7
18
8
19
9
20
0
21
22
2
23
3
24
4
25
5
26
6
27
7
28
8
-5-

JOINT SU
UBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SC
R
E
B
CHEDULE (DK NO. 90); O
KT.
ORDER - Case No. 4:17-cve
01661-HSG
G