Kochalka v. Robinson & Associates
Filing
10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND VACATING THE JULY 5, 2017 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Show Cause Response due by 7/5/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu on July 3, 2017. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/3/2017)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JOHN KOCHALKA,
Case No. 17-cv-01729-DMR
Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10
ROBINSON & ASSOCIATES,
Defendant.
12
Re: Dkt. No. 4
On March 29, 2017, Plaintiff John Kochalka filed suit in this Court. [Docket No 1]. The
13
Case Management Conference Statement (“CMC Statement”) was due on June 28, 2017. [Docket
14
No. 4]. Because no CMC Statement was filed, the court issued a Clerk’s Notice, ordering the
15
parties to file a CMC Statement by no later than 5 p.m. on June 29, 2017. [Docket No. 9]. The
16
court received no response to its Clerk’s Notice. On June 30, 2017, the court’s staff left a voice
17
mail message with Plaintiff’s counsel to remind counsel to file a CMC Statement. The court has
18
received no response to its voicemail.
19
Therefore, Plaintiff John Kochalka is ordered to respond by no later than 5 p.m. on July
20
5, 2017, and show cause why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Failure
21
to respond by July 5, 2017 may result in dismissal of this action.
The July 5, 2017 Case Management Conference is VACATED.
RT
28
______________________________________
Donna M. Ryu
United States Magistrate Judgeu
. Ry
onna M
NO
27
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
Judge D
H
ER
N
R NIA
26
Dated: July 3, 2017
FO
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LI
24
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
23
A
22
UNIT
ED
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND
VACATING THE JULY 5, 2017 CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?