Espinosa v. San Francisco
Filing
41
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Show Cause Response due by 9/24/2018. Signed by Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 9/10/2018. (kawlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/10/2018)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
GINO Q. ESPINOSA,
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
Case No. 17-cv-01766-KAW
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
v.
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, et al.,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Defendants.
12
13
On March 29, 2018, the parties held a settlement conference, in which the case was settled
14
in full. (Dkt. No. 36.) On April 5, 2018, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal within 60
15
days of the date of the order, absent any extension ordered by the Court. (Dkt. No. 37.) After
16
Plaintiff failed to file a timely dismissal, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal or for the
17
parties to file a joint status report explaining why the case has yet to be dismissed by June 22,
18
2018. (Dkt. No. 38.)
19
On June 22, 2018, Defendant filed a status report, stating that Defendant was waiting for
20
Plaintiff to send back the Request for Dismissal and Proposed Order of Dismissal, which was sent
21
on May 31, 2018. (Dkt. No. 39 at 2.) Defendant also stated that once received, Defendant would
22
need approximately 45 days to finalize the settlement. (Dkt. No. 39.) Plaintiff did not respond to
23
the Court's order.
24
On June 29, 2018, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a dismissal within 60 days of the date
25
of the order, or for the parties to file a joint status report explaining why the case has yet to be
26
dismissed. The Court warned that if Plaintiff again failed to file a dismissal or joint status report,
27
the Court would issue an order to show cause as to why Plaintiff should not be sanctioned for
28
repeatedly failing to comply with court orders.
1
Plaintiff's dismissal or the joint status report was due by August 28, 2018. As of the date
2
of this order, no dismissal or joint status report has been filed. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS
3
Plaintiff to show cause, by September 24, 2018, why Plaintiff should not be sanctioned for failing
4
to comply with court orders by: (1) filing a dismissal or joint status report, and (2) explaining why
5
Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court's prior two orders. Failure to timely respond may result
6
in the Court sanctioning Plaintiff $500.00.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 10, 2018
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?