Astrid Angolini v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 22 Stipulation Selecting Mediation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/19/2017)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Astrid Angolini, CASE No C 4:17-01793-HSG Plaintiff(s) AMENDED STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. Defendant(s) Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) ■ Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) Private ADR (specify process and provider) Note: Magistrate judges do not conduct mediations under ADR L.R. 6. To request an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, you must file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. Do not use this form. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR, unless otherwise ordered. ) ■ other requested deadline: Date: 06/23/2017 Date: 06/23/2017 Plaintiff requests the presumptive 90-day deadline; Defendant requests that ADR be completed by January 5, 2018. /s/ P. Randall Noah Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Peter J. Felsenfeld Attorney for Defendant IT IS SO ORDERED X IT IS SO ORDERED WITH MODIFICATIONS: The ADR deadline is October 10, 2017 Date: 7/19/2017 U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.” Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-2017

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?