Robin Berman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al

Filing 184

ORDER (as modified)by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 183 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2022)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, P.C., SBN 00504800 Mark G. Kisicki (CA SBN 150057) Elizabeth M. Soveranez (AZ SBN 024009) admitted pro hac vice 2415 E. Camelback Road, Suite 800 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Telephone: 602.778.3700 Fax: 602.778.3750 mark.kisicki@ogletreedeakins.com elizabeth.soveranez@ogletreedeakins.com Mark Schmidtke (IN SBN 1733-45) admitted pro hac vice 56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302 Valparaiso, IN 46383 Tel: 219.242.8668 Fax: 219.242.8669 mark.schmidtke@ogletreedeakins.com Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ROBIN BERMAN, BO KANG, KHASHAYAR No. 4:17-CV-01864-HSG MIRFAKHRAEI, THANG VAN VU, DONNA VIERA-CASTILLO, GIRISH RAMESH, PATRICK HANLEY, ILANA SHTERNSHAIN, and MANDY SCHWARZ, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REMOVE Plaintiffs, INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT; DOCKET NUMBER 180 (as modified) v. MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an employee benefit plan, 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document; Docket Number 180, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to remove 25 docket no. 180 from ECF. 26 27 28 Dated: 10/28/2022 __________________________________________ THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S GILLIAM, JR. United States District Court Judge Northern District of California ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT; DOCKET NUMBER 180 4:17-CV-01864-HSG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?