Robin Berman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al
Filing
184
ORDER (as modified)by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 183 Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document. (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2022)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C., SBN 00504800
Mark G. Kisicki (CA SBN 150057)
Elizabeth M. Soveranez (AZ SBN 024009) admitted pro hac vice
2415 E. Camelback Road, Suite 800
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Telephone: 602.778.3700
Fax: 602.778.3750
mark.kisicki@ogletreedeakins.com
elizabeth.soveranez@ogletreedeakins.com
Mark Schmidtke (IN SBN 1733-45) admitted pro hac vice
56 S. Washington Street, Suite 302
Valparaiso, IN 46383
Tel: 219.242.8668
Fax: 219.242.8669
mark.schmidtke@ogletreedeakins.com
Attorneys for Defendants
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBIN BERMAN, BO KANG, KHASHAYAR No. 4:17-CV-01864-HSG
MIRFAKHRAEI, THANG VAN VU, DONNA
VIERA-CASTILLO, GIRISH RAMESH,
PATRICK HANLEY, ILANA SHTERNSHAIN,
and MANDY SCHWARZ,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO REMOVE
Plaintiffs,
INCORRECTLY FILED DOCUMENT;
DOCKET NUMBER 180 (as modified)
v.
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY
INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL
CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL
CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE
GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an
employee benefit plan,
20
Defendants.
21
22
23
24
Upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Remove Incorrectly Filed Document; Docket
Number 180, and good cause appearing,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to remove
25 docket no. 180 from ECF.
26
27
28
Dated: 10/28/2022
__________________________________________
THE HONORABLE HAYWOOD S GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REMOVE INCORRECTLY FILED
DOCUMENT; DOCKET NUMBER 180
4:17-CV-01864-HSG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?