Robin Berman et al v. Microchip Technology Incorporated et al

Filing 71

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 70 Stipulation to Extend Deadline to Respond to and Reply in Support of 54 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/16/2018)

1
2
3
4
5

OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C., SBN 00504800
Mark G. Kisicki (CA SBN 150057)
[e-mail]
Elizabeth M. Townsend (AZ SBN 024009) admitted pro hac vice
[e-mail]
2415 E. Camelback Road, Suite 800
Phoenix, AZ 85016
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
Attorneys for Defendants
7
8

*Counsel for Plaintiffs on the following page

9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16

ROBIN BERMAN, BO KANG,
KHASHAYAR MIRFAKHRAEI, THANG
VAN VU, DONNA VIERA-CASTILLO,
GIRISH RAMESH, PATRICK HANLEY,
ILANA SHTERNSHAIN and MANDY
SCHWARZ,

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Plaintiffs,
v.
MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY
INCORPORATED, a corporation; ATMEL
CORPORATION, a corporation; and ATMEL
CORPORATION U.S. SEVERANCE
GUARANTEE BENEFIT PROGRAM, an
employee benefit plan,
Defendants.

No. 4:17-cv-01864-HSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO
RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
[Civ. L.R. 6-2]
Hearing Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:

September 13, 2018
2:00 p.m.
2, Floor 4
Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam,
Jr.

Action Filed:
Trial Date:

April 4, 2017
None Set

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

1

PLAINTIFFS’ COUNSEL:

2

Michael Rubin (SBN 80618)
Andrew Kushner (SBN 316035)
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Cliff Palefsky (SBN 77683)
Keith Ehrman (SBN 106985)
MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY
535 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94133
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
William B. Reilly (SBN 177550)
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY
86 Molino Avenue
Mill Valley, CA 94941
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

17
18

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

2

1

Plaintiffs Robin Berman, Bo Kang, Khashayar Mirfakhraei, Thang Van Vu, Donna Viera-

2

Castillo, Girish Ramesh, Patrick Hanley, Ilana Shternshain and Mandy Schwarz (collectively

3

“Plaintiffs”) filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on July 2, 2018 and noticed the hearing

4

for September 13, 2018 at 2:00 p.m.

5

Plaintiffs have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendants Microchip Technology

6

Incorporated (“Microchip”), Atmel Corporation (“Atmel”) and Atmel Corporation U.S. Severance

7

Guarantee Benefit Program (“Severance Program” and, collectively with Microchip and Atmel,

8

“Defendants”) to respond to the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment until Monday, July 30,

9

2018. Defendants have similarly agreed to extend Plaintiffs’ deadline to file their Reply in support

10

of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to August 13, 2018, which would normally be due

11

on August 6, 2018 under the local rules.

12

Accordingly, Plaintiffs and Defendants hereby stipulate, by and through their respective

13

attorneys of record, that Defendants’ time to file their Opposition to the Motion for Partial

14

Summary Judgment is extended up to and including July 30, 2018 and Plaintiffs’ time to file their

15

Reply in Support of the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment extended up to and including

16

August 13, 2018.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

Respectfully submitted July 13, 2018.
OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK &
STEWART, P.C.
By: /s/ Mark G. Kisicki
Mark G. Kisicki
Elizabeth N. Townsend admitted pro hac vice
2415 East Camelback Road, Suite 800
Phoenix, Arizona 85016
Attorneys for Defendants

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

3

1

ALTSHULER BERZON LLP

2

By: s/ Michael Rubin (with permission)
Michael Rubin
Andrew Kushner
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Cliff Palefsky
Keith Ehrman
MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY
535 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94133

11

William B. Reilly
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY
86 Molino Avenue
Mill Valley, CA 94941

12

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

10

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

4

1
2
3
4
5
6

ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
1. Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be filed
no later than July 30, 2018.
2. Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment shall be filed no
later than August 13, 2018.

7
8
9

Dated: ______________________
7/16/2018

____________________________________
The Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

5

1
2

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this

3

document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document, and that this attestation

4

was executed on July 13, 2018.

5

By: /s/ Mark G. Kisicki

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

6

1
2
3
4
5

PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Frankie Vandehei, declare:
I am a citizen of the United States and employed in Maricopa County, Arizona. I am over
the age of eighteen years and not a party to the within-entitled action. My business address is 2415
East Camelback Road, Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85016. On July 13, 2018, I served a copy of:

6
7

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO
AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND TO CONSOLIDATE HEARINGS

8
by electronic transmission.
9
10

I am familiar with the United States District Court, Northern District of California’s

11

practice for collecting and processing electronic filings.

Under that practice, documents are

12

electronically filed with the court.

13

Electronic Filing (NEF) to the filing party, the assigned judge, and any registered users in the case.

14

The NEF will constitute service of the document. Registration as a CM/ECF user constitutes

15

consent to electronic service through the court’s transmission facilities. Under said practice, the

16

following CM/ECF users were served:

The court’s CM/ECF system will generate a Notice of

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Michael Rubin
Andrew Kushner
ALTSHULER BERZON LLP
177 Post Street, Suite 300
San Francisco, CA 94108
Cliff Palefsky
Keith Ehrman
MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY
535 Pacific Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94133
William B. Reilly (SBN 177550)
LAW OFFICE OF WILLIAM REILLY
86 Molino Avenue
Mill Valley, CA 94941
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

7

1
2

Executed on July 13, 2018, at Phoenix, Arizona.
/s/ Frankie Vandehei

3

34826325.1

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO AND REPLY ISO PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
4:17-cv-01864-HSG

8