Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 112

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. DENYING PLAINTIFFS 107 MOTION TO MODIFY THE CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2018)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CHARLES BAIRD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10
11

v.
BLACKROCK INSTITUTIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, N.A., et al.,

Case No. 17-cv-01892-HSG
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO MODIFY THE CASE
MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE
Re: Dkt. No. 107

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12
13

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion to modify the case schedule by extending

14

the deadline to amend pleadings from April 23, 2018 to 24 days after the completion of document

15

production. Dkt. No. 107. Having reviewed the parties’ briefing, the Court DENIES the motion.

16

Plaintiffs have not shown that amendment to the schedule is warranted at this time. The Court can

17

assess whether Plaintiffs can meet the good cause standard if and when they seek leave to amend.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 5/1/2018
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge