Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 195

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 193 Motion for Leave to File a Consolidated Response to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2018)

1
2
3
4
5

Michelle C. Yau (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Mary J. Bortscheller (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Daniel R. Sutter (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Ave. NW ● Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Todd Jackson (Cal. Bar No. 202598)
Nina Wasow (Cal. Bar No. 242047)
FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN
& WASOW, LLP
2030 Addison Street ● Suite 500
Berkeley, CA 94704
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

OAKLAND DIVISION

11

Charles Baird et al.,
Plaintiffs,

12
13

v.

14

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company,
N.A., et al.,

15

Case No: 4:17-cv-01892-HSG
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
UNOPPOSED MOTION TO FILE A
CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

Defendants.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to File a Consolidated Response to
Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss.
IT IS SO ORDERED that Plaintiffs are granted leave to file a consolidated Response to the
motions to dismiss filed by Mercer (ECF No. 178) and BlackRock (ECF No. 181), not to exceed 45
pages. The page limitations for the replies of Mercer and BlackRock under the Local Rules remain
unchanged.
Dated: November 14, 2018

____________________________
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
California

27
28
Case No: 4:17-cv-01892-HSG: Order Granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Consolidated Response Brief
Page 1