Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al
Filing
28
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 27 Stipulation. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2017)
1
2
3
4
5
Karen L. Handorf (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle C. Yau (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Julia Horwitz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Ave. NW ● Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: (202) 408-4600
Fax: (202) 408-4699
Todd Jackson (Cal. Bar No. 202598)
Nina Wasow (Cal. Bar No. 242047)
FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN &
WASOW, LLP
383 4th Street ● Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: (510) 269-7998
Fax: (510) 269-7994
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
Charles Baird,
12
13
14
15
16
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG
Plaintiff,
v.
BlackRock Institutional Trust Company,
N.A., et al.,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY
TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RELATED
RULE 12 MOTION
Defendants.
17
18
Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Charles Baird and
19
Defendants BlackRock, Inc.; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., The BlackRock, Inc.
20
Retirement Committee; Jason Herman; The Administrative Committee of the Retirement
21
Committee; and The Investment Committee of the Retirement Committee (collectively, the
22
“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to the following:
23
1. Plaintiff sent the request for waiver of service of on April 11, 2017. As a result,
24
Defendants’ responsive pleading would ordinarily be due 60 days later, on June 12,
25
2017.
26
2. The Parties conferred and agreed to a briefing schedule in the event that Defendants
27
file a Rule 12 motion in response to the complaint due to potential scheduling
28
conflicts likely to arise for Plaintiff’s Counsel at the time such motion would likely be
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RELATED RULE 12 MOTION
Page 1 of 3
1
filed. Yau Decl. ¶¶ 3-5. The Parties have stipulated and agreed to the following
2
schedule:
3
June 1, 2017
Defendants’ responsive pleading due
4
July 14, 2017
If Defendants file a Rule 12 motion, Plaintiff’s
opposition to such motion due
July 28, 2017
Defendants’ reply due
5
6
7
8
9
3. No previous requests for time modification have been made in this case.
4. A declaration from Michelle Yau, setting forth the reasons for the Parties’ request, is
attached hereto as Exhibit A .
10
11
Dated: April 24, 2017
FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN &
WASOW, LLP
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
By:
/s/ Nina Wasow________________
Nina Wasow (Cal. Bar No. 242047)
Todd Jackson (Cal. Bar No. 202598)
383 4th Street
Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: (510) 269-7998
Fax: (510) 269-7994
nina@feinbergjackson.com
todd@feinbergjackson.com
19
26
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC
Karen L. Handorf (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle C. Yau (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Julia Horwitz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500, West Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: (202) 408-4600
Fax: (202) 408-4699
khandorf@cohenmilstein.com
myau@cohenmilstein.com
jhorwitz@cohenmilstein.com
27
Attorneys for Plaintiff
20
21
22
23
24
25
28
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
COMPLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR RELATED RULE 12 MOTION
Page 2 of 3
1
/s/ Meagh VerGow
han
w_______
2
O’MELV
VENY & M
MYERS LLP
P
Meaghan VerGow (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
n
o
Brian Boy (Cal. Bar No. 126576)
yle
r
1625 Eye Street, N.W
e
W.
Washingt
ton, D.C. 20006
Tel: (202) 383-5504
)
Fax: (202 383-5414
2)
mvergow
w@omm.com
m
bboyle@o
omm.com
3
4
5
6
7
Randall W Edwards (Cal. Bar No. 179053)
W.
Adam M. Kaplan (Ca Bar No. 2
.
al.
298077)
Two Emb
barcadero Ce
enter, 28th F
Floor
San Franc
cisco, CA 94
4111-3823
Tel: (415) 984-8700
)
Fax: (415 984-8701
5)
redwards@
@omm.com
m
akaplan@
@omm.com
8
9
10
11
12
Attorneys for Defend
s
dants
13
14
15
ATTESTA
ATION
I attest tha for all con
at
nformed sign
natures indic
cated by an “
“/s/,” the sign
natory has c
concurred in
16
the fi
iling of this document.
d
17
Dated April 24, 2017
d:
B
By:
/s/ N
Nina Wasow_
___
Nina Wasow
a
18
19
20
ER
ORDE
21
ANT TO THE STIPULA
E
ATION, IT IS SO ORDE
S
ERED:
PURSUA
22
Defendan shall resp
nts
pond to the complaint by June 1, 2017. Plaintiff s
y
shall file any opposition
y
23
R
ion
1
efendants sha file any r
all
reply by July 28, 2017.
y
to a Rule 12 moti by July 14, 2017. De
24
25
26
27
d:
Dated April 27, 2017
_
__________
___________
_________
J
Judge Hayw
wood S. Gill
liam, Jr.
U District Court for th
U.S.
t
he
N
Northern Di
istrict of California
28
Case No: 17-cv-189
N
92-HSG: STIPU
ULATION AN [PROPOSE ORDER T MODIFY T
ND
ED]
TO
TIME TO RESP
POND TO
COMP
PLAINT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FO RELATED RULE 12 MO
D
OR
D
OTION
Pa 3 of 3
age
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?