Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 377

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. GRANTING DEFENDANTS ADMINISTRATIVE 376 MOTION TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF OF INDIVIDUAL AND CORPORATE DEFENDANTS THAT EXTENDS THE PAGE LIMIT FOR A SINGLE MOTION BY FIVE PAGES. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2020)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

CHARLES BAIRD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

8
9
10
11

v.
BLACKROCK INSTITUTIONAL TRUST
COMPANY, N.A., et al.,

United States District Court
Northern District of California

Defendants.
12

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
A CONSOLIDATED MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON BEHALF
OF INDIVIDUAL AND CORPORATE
DEFENDANTS THAT EXTENDS THE
PAGE LIMIT FOR A SINGLE
MOTION BY FIVE PAGES
Re: Dkt. No. 376

13
14

Case No. 17-cv-01892-HSG

Upon consideration of the Administrative Motion to File a Consolidated Motion for

15

Summary Judgment On Behalf of Individual and Corporate Defendants That Extends the Page

16

Limit for a Single Motion by Five Pages (Dkt. No. 376), filed by Defendants BlackRock

17

Institutional Trust Company, N.A., Blackrock, Inc., the BlackRock, Inc. Retirement Committee,

18

the Investment Committee of the Retirement Committee, the Administrative Committee of the

19

Retirement Committee, the Management Development & Compensation Committee, Anne

20

Ackerley, Catherine Bolz, Chip Castille, Marc Comerchero, Paige Dickow, Daniel A. Dunay, Any

21

Engel, Nancy Everett, Joseph Feliciani, Jr., Michael Fredericks, Corin Frost, Daniel Gamba,

22

Kevin Holt, Chris Jones, Milan Lint, Philippe Matsumoto, Katherine Nedl, John Perlowski, Ann

23

Marie Petach, Andy Phillips, Kurt Schansinger, Tom Skrobe, Jeffrey A. Smith, Joel Davies, John

24

Davis, Laraine McKinnon (collectively, “Defendants”), and good cause being shown, the Motion

25

is hereby GRANTED.

26

Defendants may file a consolidated brief in support of a motion for summary judgment on

27

behalf of the individual and corporate defendants of no more than 30 pages. Plaintiffs may also

28

file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment of no more than 30 pages. The page limit

1

for Defendants’ reply in support of its motion for summary judgment will remain 15 pages.

2
3
4
5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: 9/18/2020
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge

7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2