Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 38

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 37 Stipulation TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANTS SHIRLEY HILLMAN, HEATHER F. RINGWALD TO FILING RESPONSIVE PLEADING. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2017)

1
2
3
4
5

Karen L. Handorf (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle C. Yau (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Julia Horwitz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Ave. NW ● Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Todd Jackson (Cal. Bar No. 202598)
Nina Wasow (Cal. Bar No. 242047)
FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN &
WASOW, LLP
383 4th Street ● Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

Charles Baird,

12
13
14
15
16

Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG
Plaintiff,

v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL
NOTICE

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company,
N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff Charles Baird and

19

Defendants BlackRock, Inc.; BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., The BlackRock, Inc.

20

Retirement Committee; Jason Herman; The Administrative Committee of the Retirement

21

Committee; and The Investment Committee of the Retirement Committee (collectively, the

22

“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree to the following:

23

1. On June 1, 2017, Defendants filed a Request for Judicial Notice in connection with

24

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Class Action Complaint filed on the same

25

day.

26

2. Because the Request for Judicial Notice relates to the Motion to Dismiss, the Parties

27

have conferred and agreed that it makes sense to align the remaining briefing on the

28

two motions. Yau Decl. ¶¶ 3-4. The Parties have therefore stipulated and agreed to
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Page 1 of 3

1
2

the following briefing schedule for the Request for Judicial Notice, which coincides
with the existing briefing schedule for the Motion to Dismiss:

3
July 14, 2017
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Plaintiff’s objection to the Request for Judicial Notice due

July 28, 2017

Defendants’ reply due

3. The parties have not requested any previous enlargement of time with respect to
Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice.
4. One previous request for time modification has been made during the pendency of
this action, setting the Motion to Dismiss briefing schedule, which was entered by the
court on April 27, 2017.
5. A declaration from Michelle C. Yau, setting forth the reasons for the Parties’ request,
is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

12
Dated: June 8, 2017
13

COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

By:
/s/ Julia Horwitz________________
Julia Horwitz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Karen L. Handorf (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle C. Yau (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500, West Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN &
WASOW, LLP
Nina Wasow (Cal. Bar No. 242047)
Todd Jackson (Cal. Bar No. 202598)
383 4th Street
Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Page 2 of 3

1

Attorneys for Plaintiff

2
/s/ Meaghan VerGow_______

3

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Meaghan VerGow (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Brian Boyle (Cal. Bar No. 126576)
1625 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8

Randall W. Edwards (Cal. Bar No. 179053)
Adam M. Kaplan (Cal. Bar No. 298077)
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13

Attorneys for Defendants

14

ATTESTATION

15
16

I attest that for all conformed signatures indicated by an “/s/,” the signatory has concurred in

17 the filing of this document.
18 Dated: June 8, 2017

By:

/s/ Julia Horwitz___
Julia Horwitz

19

[PROPOSED] ORDER

20
21

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

22

Plaintiff shall file any objection to Defendants’ Request for Judicial Notice by July 14, 2017.

23

Defendants shall file any reply by July 28, 2017.

24
25
26
27

Dated: ______________, 2017
June 9

____________________________
__ ________ _______
____________________________
_____ ____ __ _____
_
Judge
Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.
g
U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of California

28
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Page 3 of 3