Baird v. BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A. et al

Filing 82

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 81 Stipulation re 80 Request for Judicial Notice. Responses due by 12/8/2017; Replies due by 12/22/2017. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/17/2017)

1
2
3
4
5
6

Karen L. Handorf (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle C. Yau (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Julia Horwitz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Mary J. Bortscheller (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Julie Selesnick (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL PLLC
1100 New York Ave. NW ● Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

Todd Jackson (Cal. Bar No. 202598)
Nina Wasow (Cal. Bar No. 242047)
FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN &
WASOW, LLP
383 4th Street ● Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94607
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11

Charles Baird et al.,

12
13
14
15
16

Plaintiffs,
v.

Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY
TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS’
REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

BlackRock Institutional Trust Company,
N.A., et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

Pursuant to Northern District of California Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiffs Charles Baird and

19

Lauren Slayton and Defendants Anne Ackerley, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A.,

20

Blackrock, Inc., Catherine Bolz, Chip Castille, Paige Dickow, Daniel A. Dunay, Any Engel, Nancy

21

Everett, Joseph Feliciani, Jr., Michael Fredericks, Corin Frost, Daniel Gamba, Kevin Holt, Chris

22

Jones, Philippe Matsumoto, John Perlowski, Ann Marie Petach, Andy Phillips, Kurt Schansinger,

23

Tom Skrobe, Jeffrey A. Smith, the BlackRock, Inc. Retirement Committee, and the Investment

24

Committee of the Retirement Committee (collectively, the “Defendants”) by and through their

25

respective counsel, stipulate and agree to the following:

26

1. On November 8, 2017, Defendants filed a Request for Judicial Notice in connection

27

with Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Class Action Complaint,

28

filed on the same day.
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

Page 1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5

2. Because the Request for Judicial Notice relates to the Motion to Dismiss, the Parties
have conferred and agreed that it makes sense to align the remaining briefing on the
two motions. Bortscheller Decl. ¶¶ 3-4. The Parties have therefore stipulated and
agreed to the following briefing schedule for the Request for Judicial Notice, which
coincides with the existing briefing schedule for the Motion to Dismiss:

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

December 8, 2017

Plaintiffs’ objection to the Request for Judicial Notice due

December 22, 2017 Defendants’ reply due
3. The parties have not requested any previous enlargement of time with respect to this
Request for Judicial Notice.
4. There have been four previous time adjustments in this matter, none of which affected
discovery or the trial date and each of which related to the motion to dismiss the
original complaint and its hearing schedule. (ECF Nos. 28, 38, 48, 55.)
5. A declaration from Mary J. Bortscheller, setting forth the reasons for the Parties’
request, is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Dated: November 17, 2017
COHEN MILSTEIN SELLERS & TOLL, PLLC
By:

/s/ Julia Horwitz________________
Julia Horwitz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Karen L. Handorf (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle C. Yau (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Julia A. Horwitz (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Mary J. Bortscheller (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Julie Selesnick (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
1100 New York Avenue, N.W.
Suite 500, West Tower
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
FEINBERG, JACKSON, WORTHMAN &
WASOW, LLP
Nina Wasow (Cal. Bar No. 242047)

Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

Page 2 of 4

1

5

Todd Jackson (Cal. Bar No. 202598)
383 4th Street
Suite 201
Oakland, CA 94607
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2
3
4

7

/s/ Meaghan VerGow_______

8

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
Meaghan VerGow (admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Brian Boyle (Cal. Bar No. 126576)
1625 Eye Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20006
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

9
10
11
12
13

17

Randall W. Edwards (Cal. Bar No. 179053)
Adam M. Kaplan (Cal. Bar No. 298077)
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3823
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

18

Attorneys for Defendants

14
15
16

19
20
21
22
23

ATTESTATION
I attest that for all conformed signatures indicated by an “/s/,” the signatory has concurred in
the filing of this document.
Dated: November 17, 2017

By:

/s/ Julia Horwitz___
Julia Horwitz

24
25
26
27
28
Case No: 17-cv-1892-HSG: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY TIME TO RESPOND TO
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE

Page 3 of 4

1
2
3
4

ORDE
ER
PURSUA
ANT TO THE STIPULA
E
ATION, IT IS SO ORDE
S
ERED:
Plaintiffs shall file an objection to Defendan Request for Judicial Notice by D
ny
t
nts’
December 8,
2017. Defendants shall file an reply by December 2 2017.
s
ny
D
22,

5
6
7
8
9

Dated Novembe 17, 2017
d:
er

_
__________
___________
_________
J
Judge Hayw
wood S. Gill
liam, Jr.
U District Court for th
U.S.
t
he
N
Northern Di
istrict of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No: 17-cv-189
N
92-HSG: STIPU
ULATION AN ORDER TO MODIFY TI
ND
O
IME TO RESP
POND TO
DEFE
ENDANTS’ RE
EQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NO
OTICE

Page 4 of 4